ObjectiveTo compare transradial artery access (TRA) to the gold standard of transfemoral artery access (TFA) in mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for stroke caused by anterior circulation large vessel occlusion.MethodsThe clinical outcomes, procedural speed, angiographic efficacy and safety of both techniques were analysed in 375 consecutive cases over an 18-month period in a high volume statewide neurointerventional service.ResultsThere was no significant difference in patient characteristics, stroke parameters, imaging techniques or intracranial techniques. The median time elapsed between CT scanning and reperfusion was 96.5 min (IQR 68–123) in the TFA group and 95 min (IQR 68–123) in the TRA group (p=0.456). Of 336 patients who were independent at presentation 58% (124/214) of the TFA group and 67% (82/122) of the TRA group had a modified Rankin score of 0–2 at 90-day follow-up (p=0.093). Cross-over from radial to femoral was 4.6% (4/130) compared with 1.6% cross-over from femoral to radial (4/245), but did not meet the predetermined level of statistical significance (OR 2.92, 95% CI 0.81 to 10.52), p=0.088) and did not impact median procedural speed. Adequate angiographic reperfusion, first pass reperfusion, embolisation to new territory and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage were similar in both groups. There was a significant difference in major access site complications requiring an additional procedure. None of the TRA cases had a major access site complication but 6.5% (16/245) of the TFA cases did (p=0.003).ConclusionThis study suggests that using TRA for anterior circulation MT is fast, efficacious, safe and not inferior to the gold standard of TFA.

No anatomy text specifically describes the course of the sciatic nerve (SN) in the gluteal region in children. Anatomical information is largely derived from cadaveric studies of adults, so accurate anatomical information about the location of the SN in children is required. The aim of this study is to assess the surface anatomy of the SN in children using computed tomography (CT). After excluding studies with pelvic pathology, 75 CT scans were analyzed. Three groups were selected for analysis (0-2, 4-6, and 8-10 years). The position of the SN was measured between the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) and the ischial tuberosity (IT) and between the IT and the greater trochanter (GT) using 3-dimensional images. In the 0-2 age group, the SN crossed the middle third of a line between the PSIS and the IT in 94% and the GT and the IT in 80% of cases. In the 4-6 age group, the SN crossed the middle third of a line between the PSIS and the IT in 96% and the GT and the IT in 87%. In the 8-10 age group, the SN crossed the middle third of a line between the PSIS and the IT in 100% and the GT and the IT in 71%. The findings indicate that the SN in children is most accurately located in the middle third along a line drawn from the PSIS to the IT and the GT to the IT. Our study is the first to provide anatomical CT data from living children to guide interventions in the gluteal region.

No abstract

BackgroundRadial artery access for transarterial procedures has gained recent traction in neurointerventional due to decreased patient morbidity, technical feasibility, and improved patient satisfaction. Upper extremity transvenous access (UETV) has recently emerged as an alternative strategy for the neurointerventionalist, but data are limited. Our objective was to quantify the use of UETV access in neurointerventions and to measure failure and complication rates.MethodsAn international multicenter retrospective review of medical records for patients undergoing UETV neurointerventions or diagnostic procedures was performed. We also present our institutional protocol for obtaining UETV and review the existing literature.ResultsOne hundred and thirteen patients underwent a total of 147 attempted UETV procedures at 13 centers. The most common site of entry was the right basilic vein. There were 21 repeat puncture events into the same vein following the primary diagnostic procedure for secondary interventional procedures without difficulty. There were two minor complications (1.4%) and five failures (ie, conversion to femoral vein access) (3.4%).ConclusionsUETV is safe and technically feasible for diagnostic and neurointerventional procedures. Further studies are needed to determine the benefit over alternative venous access sites and the effect on patient satisfaction.