The smaller volume oral sodium phosphate was not associated with any clinically significant problem, caused no increase in the incidence of side effects, was preferred by patients, and was more effective in colonic cleansing. However, the hyperphosphatemia seen may limit its use in patients with impaired renal function.
One hundred fifty-one patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) grouped into four strata based on entry serum bilirubin ( < 2 mg/dL vs. 2 md/dL or greater) and liver histology (stages I, II vs. stages III, IV-Ludwig criteria) were randomized within each stratum to ursodiol or placebo given in a single dose of 10 to 12 mg/kg at bedtime for 2 years. Placebo- (n = 74) and ursodiol- treated (n = 77) patients were well matched at baseline for demographic and prognostic factors. Ursodiol induced major improvements in biochemical tests of the liver in strata 1 and 2 (entry bilirubin < 2), but had less effect on laboratory tests in patients with entry serum bilirubin of > or +2 (strata 3 and 4). Histology was favorably affected by ursodiol in patients in strata 1 and 2 but not in strata 3 and 4. Ursodiol enrichment in fasting bile obtained at the conclusion of the trail was approximately 40% and comparable in all strata. Thus, differences in ursodiol enrichment of the bile acid pool do not explain better responses of laboratory tests and histology found in patients with less advanced PBC. Patients treated will ursodiol tended to develop a treatment failure less frequently that those who received placebo, particularly in strata 1 and 2 (ursodiol 42%, placebo 60%, P = .078). Development of severe symptoms (fatigue/pruritus) and doubling of serum bilirubin were reduced significantly in ursodiol-treated patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
One hundred fifty-one patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) grouped into four strata based on entry serum bilirubin (<2 mg/dL vs. 2 mg/dL or greater) and liver histology (stages I, 1 1 vs. stages 111, IV-Ludwig criteria) were randomized within each stratum to ursodiol or placebo given in a single dose of 10 to 12 mgkg at bedtime for 2 years. Placebo-(n = 74) and ursodioltreated (n = 77) patients were well matched at baseline for demographic and prognostic factors. Ursodiol induced major improvements in biochemical tests of the liver in strata 1 and 2 (entry bilirubin <2), but had less effect on laboratory tests in patients with entry serum bilirubin of 2 2 (strata 3 and 4). Histology was favorably affected by ursodiol in patients in strata 1 and 2 but not in strata 3 and 4. Ursodiol enrichment in fasting bile obtained at the conclusion of the trial was approximately 40% and comparable in all strata. Thus, differences in ursodiol enrichment of the bile acid pool do not explain better responses of laboratory tests and histology found in patients with less advanced PBC. Patients treated with ursodiol tended to develop a treatment failure less frequently than those who received placebo, particularly in strata 1 and 2 (ursodiol42%, placebo WO, P = .078). Development of severe symptoms (fatigue/pru-Abbreviations: PBC, primary biliary cirrhosis; M-W, Mann-Whitney. From the 'University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center a t Dallas, Dallas, Tx; '
Use of low-dose NSAIDs was not associated with an increase in disease activity for these outpatients with either CD or UC. Use of high-doses of NSAIDs was associated with a higher numerical disease activity index score among CD patients with colonic involvement, but this was not reflected by an increase in significant disease flares.
Among this group of outpatients, NSAID use was not associated with a higher likelihood of active IBD. NSAID use in IBD deserves further study before recommending that patients refrain from their use under all circumstances.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.