The OECD validation study of the zebrafish embryo acute toxicity test (ZFET) for acute aquatic toxicity testing evaluated the ZFET reproducibility by testing 20 chemicals at 5 different concentrations in 3 independent runs in at least 3 laboratories. Stock solutions and test concentrations were analytically confirmed for 11 chemicals. Newly fertilised zebrafish eggs (20/concentration and control) were exposed for 96h to chemicals. Four apical endpoints were recorded daily as indicators of acute lethality: coagulation of the embryo, lack of somite formation, non-detachment of the tail bud from the yolk sac and lack of heartbeat. Results (LC50 values for 48/96h exposure) show that the ZFET is a robust method with a good intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility (CV<30%) for most chemicals and laboratories. The reproducibility was lower (CV>30%) for some very toxic or volatile chemicals, and chemicals tested close to their limit of solubility. The ZFET is now available as OECD Test Guideline 236. Considering the high predictive capacity of the ZFET demonstrated by Belanger et al. (2013) in their retrospective analysis of acute fish toxicity and fish embryo acute toxicity data, the ZFET is ready to be considered for acute fish toxicity for regulatory purposes.

The fish embryo test (FET) is a potential animal alternative for the acute fish toxicity (AFT) test. A comprehensive validation program assessed 20 different chemicals to understand intra- and interlaboratory variability for the FET. The FET had sufficient reproducibility across a range of potencies and modes of action. In the present study, the suitability of the FET as an alternative model is reviewed by relating FET and AFT. In total, 985 FET studies and 1531 AFT studies were summarized. The authors performed FET-AFT regressions to understand potential relationships based on physical-chemical properties, species choices, duration of exposure, chemical classes, chemical functional uses, and modes of action. The FET-AFT relationships are very robust (slopes near 1.0, intercepts near 0) across 9 orders of magnitude in potency. A recommendation for the predictive regression relationship is based on 96-h FET and AFT data: log FET median lethal concentration (LC50) = (0.989 × log fish LC50) - 0.195; n = 72 chemicals, r = 0.95, p < 0.001, LC50 in mg/L. A similar, not statistically different regression was developed for the entire data set (n = 144 chemicals, unreliable studies deleted). The FET-AFT regressions were robust for major chemical classes with suitably large data sets. Furthermore, regressions were similar to those for large groups of functional chemical categories such as pesticides, surfactants, and industrial organics. Pharmaceutical regressions (n = 8 studies only) were directionally correct. The FET-AFT relationships were not quantitatively different from acute fish-acute fish toxicity relationships with the following species: fathead minnow, rainbow trout, bluegill sunfish, Japanese medaka, and zebrafish. The FET is scientifically supportable as a rational animal alternative model for ecotoxicological testing of acute toxicity of chemicals to fish.

Exposure to some compounds with estrogenic activity, during fetal development, has been shown to alter development of reproductive organs, leading to abnormal function and disease either after birth or during adulthood. In order to understand the molecular events associated with the estrogenicity of different chemicals and to determine whether common sets of gene expression changes can be predictive of estrogenic activity, we have used microarray technology to determine the transcriptional program influenced by exposure to this class of compounds during organogenesis and development. Changes in patterns of gene expression were determined in the developing uterus and ovaries of Sprague-Dawley rats on GD 20, exposed to graded dosages (sc) of 17alpha-ethynyl estradiol (EE), genistein, or bisphenol A (BPA) from GD 11 to GD 20. Dose levels were roughly equipotent in estrogenic activity. We compared the transcript profiles between treatment groups and controls, using oligonucleotide arrays to determine the expression level of approximately 7000 rat genes and over 1000 expressed squence tags (ESTs). At the highest tested doses of EE, BPA, or genistein, we determined that less than 2% of the mRNA detected by the array showed a 2-fold or greater change in their expression level (increase or decrease). A dose-dependent analysis of the transcript profile revealed a common set of genes whose expression is significantly and reproducibly modified in the same way by each of the 3 chemicals tested. Additionally, each compound induces changes in the expression of other transcripts that are not in common with the others, which indicated not all compounds with estrogenic activity act alike. The results of this study demonstrate that transplacental exposure to chemicals with estrogenic activity changes the gene expression profile of estrogen-sensitive tissues, and that the analysis of the transcript profile of these tissues could be a valuable approach to determining the estrogenicity of different compounds.

Abstract-Risk assessments for compounds released to the environment typically rely on single-species toxicity studies to predict concentrations at which effects may be observed. These single-species toxicity studies are usually conducted with a few species, cultured under optimum conditions (diet, temperature, light, etc.) and tested in clean water with constant exposure to the compound of interest. Chronic toxicity data are then extrapolated to the ecosystem during risk assessments to predict concentrations that will not adversely impact the environment. Several approaches have been developed that apply statistical methods to estimate toxicant concentrations adversely affecting a small percentage of single species (e.g., 5%). There are several rarely stated, and infrequently tested, biological and statistical assumptions required to make this extrapolation. One test of the ability to use single-species toxicity data to protect ecosystems is to compare effects on single species with effects on experimental and natural ecosystems (e.g., microcosms, model ecosystems, field). Towards this end, we summarized the chronic single-species and experimental ecosystem data on a variety of substances (n ϭ 11), including heavy metals, pesticides, surfactants, and general organic and inorganic compounds. Single-species data were summarized as genus-specific geometric means using the NOEC or EC20 concentration.Genus mean values spanned a range of values with genera being affected at concentrations above and below those causing effects on model ecosystems. Geometric mean model ecosystem no effect concentrations corresponded to concentrations expected to exceed the NOEC of 10 to 52% of genera. This analysis suggests that laboratory-generated single-species chronic studies can be used to establish concentrations protective of model ecosystem, and likely whole ecosystem, effects. Further, the use of the 5% of genera affected level is conservative relative to mean model ecosystem data but is a fairly good predictor of the lower 95% confidence interval on the mean model ecosystem NOEC.

No abstract