Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the gold standard in the care of patients with cholelithiasis. A standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy employs three trocar incisions outside the umbilicus, which are a source of potential wound complications and an undesirable cosmetic outcome. We describe here a modification of the laparoscopic cholecystectomy which utilizes two transumbilical trocars and two transabdominal gallbladder stay sutures and does not require abdominal wall incisions outside the umbilicus. When technically feasible, this technique results in superior cosmesis and may reduce postoperative wound complications.

No difference in the rate of postoperative intra-abdominal abscesses exists between laparoscopic and open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. Wound infections and ileus complicate the postoperative course of patients after laparoscopic appendectomy less frequently than after open appendectomy. The conversion of laparoscopic to open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis is associated with increased postoperative morbidity.

A newly developed endoscopic platform provides stable intraluminal working space, dynamic tissue retraction, and instrument triangulation, improving visualization and access to the target tissue for safer and more effective en bloc endoscopic submucosal and submuscular dissection. The learning curve for ESD was markedly facilitated by this new endoscopic platform.

Treatment of colonic injury has progressed since the recognition of the value of colostomy or bowel exteriorization during the second World War. The treatment guidelines take into consideration the time interval between perforation and treatment as well as the nature, the site, and the cause of perforation. Laparoscopic primary repair of relatively small colonic perforations without spillage of bowel content has been reported. Extensive large bowel injury with appreciable colonic spillage usually requires a laparotomy and diversion. We report a case of a 57-year-old woman who presented with extensive rectosigmoid injury and colonic spillage after colonoscopy and was treated using laparoscopic assistance.

BackgroundSeveral minimally invasive technologies are available to treat common soft tissue lesions including symptomatic hemorrhoids. The use of energy to deliver heat and coagulate target lesions is commonly practiced. This study compares the histologic effects produced on intestinal tissues by two energy-based systems which employ different approaches of heat delivery.MethodsTwo heat delivery systems were evaluated in vivo in a single porcine subject: infrared coagulator and bipolar tissue ligator utilizing constant tissue compression and temperature guidance. Eighteen treatment sites divided into three groups of six were assessed. Treatment site temperature was measured and the effects of thermal treatment in the mucosa, submucosa, submucosal vessels, and muscularis layer were scored. Lateral thermal spread beyond the energy application site was also assessed.ResultsTreatment site temperatures were much lower in the bipolar ligator group than in the infrared coagulator group. The mucosal and submucosal tissue changes observed in tissues treated with infrared energy and bipolar energy at 55°C were similar. Both the mucosal and submucosal tissue changes with bipolar energy at 50°C were significantly less.ConclusionBoth devices achieved similar histologic results. However, the unique design of the bipolar ligator, which allows consistent capture, constant compression, and temperature monitoring of target tissue, accomplished the desired histologic changes with less muscular damage at much lower temperatures than the infrared coagulator. The use of bipolar ligation could offer clinical advantages such as reduced patient pain and a minimized chance of heat-related collateral tissue damage.