A proportion of patients with spondylolisthesis had highly abnormal movements but ones with normal magnitudes of motion. Determining the instantaneous axes of rotation reveals the abnormal quality of motion.
Background: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Open Payments public database, resulting from the Physician Payments Sunshine Act of 2010, was designed to increase transparency of physicians’ financial relationships with pharmaceutical manufacturers. We compared physician-reported conflict-of-interest (COI) disclosures in journal articles with this database to determine any discrepancies in physician-reported disclosures. Methods: COIs reported by authors from 2014 through 2016 were analyzed in 3 journals: Foot & Ankle International (FAI), The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (JBJS), and The Journal of Arthroplasty (JOA). Payment information in the CMS Open Payments database was cross-referenced with each author’s disclosure statement to determine if a disclosure discrepancy was present. Results: We reviewed 3,465 authorship positions (1,932 unique authors) in 1,770 articles. Within this sample, 7.1% of authorships had a recorded undisclosed COI (disclosure discrepancy), and 13.2% of articles had first and/or last authors with a disclosure discrepancy. Additionally, we saw a great variation in the percentage of authorships with disclosure discrepancies among the journals (JBJS, 2.3%; JOA, 3.6%; and FAI, 23.7%). Conclusions: Discrepancies exist between payment disclosures made by authors and those published in the CMS Open Payments database. Although the percentage of articles with these discrepancies varies widely among the journals that were analyzed in this study, no trend was found when analyzing the number of discrepancies over the 3-year period. Clinical Relevance: COI disclosures are important for the interpretation of study results and need to be accurately reported. However, COI disclosure criteria vary among orthopaedic journals, causing uncertainty regarding which conflicts should be disclosed.
Background:Arthroscopic lysis of adhesions is a treatment option for patients with painful, stiff knees as a result of arthrofibrosis following knee arthroplasty, in whom prior manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) has failed. Typically, nonoperative treatment in these patients has also failed, including aggressive physiotherapy, stretching, dynamic splinting, and various pain-management measures or medications. Range of motion in these patients is often suboptimal, and any gains in flexibility will likely have hit a plateau over many months. The goal of performing lysis of adhesions is to increase the range of motion in patients with knee stiffness following total knee arthroplasty, as well as to reduce pain and restore physiologic function of the knee, enabling activities of daily living.Description:This is a straightforward surgical technique that can be performed in a single stage. The preoperative range of motion is documented after induction of general anesthesia. The procedure begins with the establishment of standard medial and lateral parapatellar arthroscopic portals. A blunt trocar is introduced into the knee, and blunt, manual lysis of adhesions is performed in the suprapatellar pouch and the medial and lateral gutters with use of a sweeping motion after piercing and perforating the scarred adhesive bands or capsular tissue. Next, the arthroscope is inserted into the knee, and a diagnostic arthroscopy is performed. Bands of fibrous tissue are released and resected with use of electrocautery and a 4.0-mm arthroscopic shaver. Next, the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is visualized in full flexion. If PCL tightness is observed, the PCL can be released from its femoral origin until the flexion gap is increased. This portion of the procedure can include either partial or full release of the PCL, as indicated. Next, the arthroscope is removed and the ipsilateral hip is flexed to 90° for a standard MUA. Gentle force is applied to the proximal aspect of the tibia, and the knee is flexed. After completing the MUA, immediate post-intervention range of motion of the knee is documented, and the patient is provided with a continuous passive motion (CPM) machine set to the maximum flexion and extension achieved in the operating room.Alternatives:Nonoperative treatment of a stiff knee following total knee arthroplasty is well documented in the current literature. Range of motion has been shown to increase in patients undergoing proper pain management, aggressive physical therapy, and closed MUA in the acute postoperative setting. Additionally, more severe cases of established arthrofibrosis despite prior MUA can be treated with an open lysis of adhesions1-3.Rationale:Arthroscopic lysis of adhesions with PCL release versus resection has been well described previously. This procedure has been shown to benefit patients in whom initial nonoperative treatment has failed. Additionally, this procedure is not limited to the immediate acute postoperative period like standard MUA3. To our knowledge, no technique video has been...
Category: Bunion Introduction/Purpose: Recurrence of hallux valgus deformity is a common post-operative complication with rates in the literature ranging from 2.7 – 30%. Lateral displacement of the great toe medial sesamoid is correlated with a high recurrence rate, and failure to reduce sesamoid position has been implicated as a risk factor for recurrence due to an uncorrected deforming force. Sesamoid position has been studied in relation with Scarf osteotomy, but not other corrective osteotomies. The goal of this study is to determine the efficacy of the double chevron and Akin osteotomy in reducing the great toe medial sesamoid. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients in the last five years undergoing hallux valgus correction via the double chevron and Akin osteotomy method with pre-operative and post-operative weight bearing radiographs. We measured sesamoid position pre and post-operatively using the Hardy-Clapham (HC) scale of I-VII with V or greater representing a laterally displaced medial sesamoid. We also measured hallux valgus and inter-metatarsal angles. Measurements were made by three authors in orthopedics and one in radiology. We used intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) to determine inter-observer agreement and establish reliability. With adequate ICC, we could consider the lead author’s measurements as representative of the group. We examined the percent of hallux valgus cases with displaced sesamoids pre-operatively. Next, we determined how many of those cases did we reduce the sesamoids to grade IV or less. Finally, we performed subgroup analysis for pre-operative HC grades V, VI, and VII to determine correction percentage by severity. Results: There were 49 patients with 53 feet treated with the double chevron and Akin osteotomies for hallux valgus correction. Of these, 39 (73.6%) had significant preoperative lateral displacement of the medial sesamoid characterized by HC grade of V or greater. We corrected 30/39 (77.0%) to a reduced position of HC grade IV or less (p-value 0.048). In sub-analysis, we achieved reduction of the medial sesamoid position in 14/14 feet (100%) with HC grade V, 6/9 feet (66.7%) with HC grade VI, and 10/16 feet (62.5%) with HC grade VII (p-value 0.037). The ICC was 0.91 for pre-operative HC scores and 0.79 for post-operative HC scores. Average pre and post-operative HVA was 29.4° and 8.7°, respectively. Average pre and post-operative IMA was 13° and 5.2° respectively. Conclusion: Our study validates the double chevron and Akin osteotomies as effective in correcting sesamoid position. We achieved correction in 30/39 (77%) cases with initial sesamoid displacement. For mild cases of displacement with HC grade V, sesamoid correction was always achieved, and we were likely to achieve correction in the more severe cases of sesamoid displacement with HC grade VI or VII as well. The technique is also effective at reducing HVA and IMA. We had acceptable inter- observer agreement which supports the reliability of our methods. Future studies should exam...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.