Interprocedural analyses enable optimizing compilers to more precisely model the effects of non-inlined procedure calls, pot+ially resulting in substantial increases in application performance. Applying interprocedura! analysis to programs written in object-oriented or functional languages is complicated by the difficulty of constructing an accurate program call graph. This paper presents a parameterized algorithmic framework for call graph cohstruction in the presence'of message sends and/or firstclass functions. We use this framework to describe and to implement a number of well-known and new algorithms. We then empirically assess these algorithms by applying them to a suite of medium-sized programs writtgn in Cecil and Java, reporting on the relative cost of the analyses, the relative precision of the constructed call graphs, and the impact of this precision on the effectiveness of a number of interprocedural optimizations.

The Factored Control Flow Graph, FCFG, is a novel representation of a program's intraprocedural control flow, which is designed to efficiently support the analysis of programs written in languages, such as Java, that have frequently occurring operations whose execution may result in exceptional control flow. The FCFG is more compact than traditional CFG representations for exceptional control flow, yet there is no loss of precision in using the FCFG. In this paper, we introduce the FCFG representation and outline how standard forward and backward data flow analysis algorithms can be adapted to work on this representation. We also present empirical measurements of FCFG sizes for a large number of methods obtained from a variety of Java programs, and compare these sizes with those of a traditional CFG representation.

Dataflow analyses can have mutually beneficial interactions. Previous efforts to exploit these interactions have either (1) iteratively performed each individual analysis until no further improvements are discovered or (2) developed "superanalyses" that manually combine conceptually separate analyses. We have devised a new approach that allows analyses to be defined independently while still enabling them to be combined automatically and profitably. Our approach avoids the loss of precision associated with iterating individual analyses and the implementation difficulties of manually writing a super-analysis. The key to our approach is a novel method of implicit communication between the individual components of a super-analysis based on graph transformations. In this paper, we precisely define our approach; we demonstrate that it is sound and it terminates; finally we give experimental results showing that in practice (1) our framework produces results at least as precise as iterating the individual analyses while compiling at least 5 times faster, and (2) our framework achieves the same precision as a manually written super-analysis while incurring a compiletime overhead of less than 20%.

The use of dynamically-dispatched procedure calls is a key mechanism for writing extensible and flexible code in object-oriented languages. Unfortunately, dynamic dispatching imposes a runtime performance penalty. Some recent implementations of pure object-oriented languages have utilized profile-guided receiver class prediction to reduce this performance penalty, and some researchers have argued for applying receiver class prediction in hybrid languages like C++. We performed a detailed examination of the dynamic profiles of eight large object-oriented applications written in C++ and Cecil, determining that the receiver class distributions are strongly peaked and stable across both inputs and program versions through time. We describe techniques for gathering and manipulating profile information at varying degrees of precision, particularly in the presence of optimizations such as inlining. Our implementation of profile-guided receiver class prediction improves the performance of large Cecil applications by more than a factor of two over solely static optimizations.

Dynamic dispatching is a major source of run-time overhead in object-oriented languages, due both to the direct cost of method lookup and to the indirect effect of preventing other optimizations. To reduce this overhead, optimizing compilers for object-oriented languages analyze the classes of objects stored in program variables, with the goal of bounding the possible classes of message receivers enough so that the compiler can uniquely determine the target of a message send at compile time and replace the message send with a direct procedure call. Specialization is one important technique for improving the precision of this static class information: by compiling multiple versions of a method, each applicable to a subset of the possible argument classes of the method, more precise static information about the classes of the method's arguments is obtained. Previous specialization strategies have not been selective about where this technique is applied, and therefore tended to significantly increase compile time and code space usage, particularly for large applications. In this paper, we present a more general framework for specialization in object-oriented languages and describe a goal directed specialization algorithm that makes selective decisions to apply specialization to those cases where it provides the highest benefit. Our results show that our algorithm improves the performance of a group of sizeable programs by 65% to 275% while increasing compiled code space requirements by only 4% to 10%. Moreover, when compared to the previous state-of-the-art specialization scheme, our algorithm improves performance by 11% to 67% while simultaneously reducing code space requirements by 65% to 73%.