Background: Observational studies have suggested that accelerated surgery is associated with improved outcomes in patients with a hip fracture. The HIP ATTACK trial assessed whether accelerated surgery could reduce mortality and major complications. Methods:We randomised 2970 patients from 69 hospitals in 17 countries. Patients with a hip fracture that required surgery and were ≥45 years of age were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned to accelerated surgery (goal of surgery within 6 hours of diagnosis; 1487 patients) or standard care (1483 patients). The co-primary outcomes were 1.) mortality, and 2.) a composite of major complications (i.e., mortality and non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, venous thromboembolism, sepsis, pneumonia, life-threatening bleeding, and major bleeding) at 90 days after randomisation. Outcome adjudicators were masked to treatment allocation, and patients were analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02027896. Findings:The median time from hip fracture diagnosis to surgery was 6 hours (interquartile range [IQR] 4-9) in the accelerated-surgery group and 24 hours (IQR 10-42) in the standard-care group, p<0.0001. Death occurred in 140 patients (9%) assigned to accelerated surgery and 154 patients (10%) assigned to standard care; hazard ratio (HR) 0.91, 95% CI 0.72-1.14; absolute risk reduction (ARR) 1%, 95% CI -1-3%; p=0.40. The primary composite outcome occurred in 321 patients (22%) randomised to accelerated surgery and 331 patients (22%) randomised to standard care; HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.83-1.13; ARR 1%, 95% CI -2-3%; p=0.71.Interpretation: Among patients with a hip fracture, accelerated surgery did not significantly lower the risk of mortality or a composite of major complications compared to standard care.

No abstract

No abstract

Patients who had previously undergone BF were better prepared for their procedure; however, satisfaction levels after the procedure were similar in both groups. Results suggest that medical staff should target patients who have not undergone BF previously to relieve anxiety.

Objective. ANCA-associated vasculitides (AAV) are a heterogeneous group of rare diseases with unknown aetiology and the clinical spectrum ranging from life-threatening systemic disease, through single organ involvement to minor isolated skin changes. Thus, there is an unmet need for phenotype identification, especially among patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA). Patients with microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) seem to be clinically much more uniform. Recently, three subcategories of AAV have been proposed and described as non-severe AAV, severe PR3-AAV, and severe MPO-AAV. Methods. In line with these attempts, we decided to use an unbiased approach offered by latent class analysis (LCA) to subcategorise GPA and MPA in a large cohort of Polish AAV patients included in a multicentre POLVAS registry. Results. LCA of our AAV group identified a four-class model of AAV, including previously proposed three subphenotypes and revealing a fourth (previously not described) clinically relevant subphenotype. This new subphenotype includes only GPA patients, usually diagnosed at a younger age as compared to other groups, and characterised by multiorgan involvement, high relapse rate, relatively high risk of death, but no end-stage kidney disease. Conclusion. Based on multiple clinical and serological variables, LCA methodology identified 4-class model of AAV. This newly described fourth class of AAV may be of clinical relevance and may require prompt diagnosis and aggressive treatment due to the multio-rgan involvement, high risk of relapse and marked mortality among these relatively young GPA subjects.