Cancer metastasis is a major cause of death among women afflicted with breast cancer (BC) and understanding the molecular processes involved is a major focus in BC research. Circular RNAs (circRNAs) have emerged as genomic regulatory molecules in carcinogenesis and metastasis; however, their role in BC is unclear. We characterized a novel circRNA, hsa_circ_0000515, in context of BC. We collected 340 cancerous tissues surgically resected from BC patients and found hsa_circ_0000515 was upregulated in BC tissues and associated with poor prognosis of BC. Silencing of hsa_circ_0000515 impaired cell cycle progression, cell proliferation, and invasion, attenuated inflammatory response, and reduced the proangiogenetic potential of BC cells. RNA pull‐down and dual‐luciferase reporter gene assays showed that hsa_circ_0000515 binds miR‐296‐5p, preventing it from repressing CXCL10 expression. We also observed that miR‐296‐5p inhibition or CXCL10 overexpression promoted cell cycle progression, restored proliferative, invasive and proangiogenetic abilities, and increased inflammatory response in MCF‐7 cells in the absence of hsa_circ_0000515. In vivo analyses showed that partial loss of hsa_circ_0000515 reduced the tumor growth of MCF‐7 cells in nude mice. The key findings from this study revealed that targeting hsa_circ_0000515 might be an effective strategy to combat BC.

No abstract

No abstract

Liver cancer cells often exhibit mesenchymal phenotypes, a critical phenotypic alteration of cancer cells termed the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). To examine whether liver kinase B1 (LKB1) serves a potential role in EMT in liver carcinogenesis, in the present study, it was determined that the expression of LKB1 decreased in the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cell line, compared with a normal liver cell line. LKB1 overexpression decreased cell motility and invasiveness. Furthermore, the loss of LKB1 induced the expression of several EMT marker proteins, including that of Zinc Finger E-Box Binding Homeobox 1 (ZEB1). Notably, the expression of Yes-associated protein (YAP) was positively associated with that of ZEB1 in LKB1-knockdown cells with a mesenchymal phenotype. Here, we describe the direct regulation of the Hippo pathway effector YAP by ZEB1. The findings of the present study demonstrate that ZEB1 regulates the expression of YAP and regulates the expression of downstream target genes to promote malignant progression.

Background: It was a difficult question to identify candidates who would benefit most from adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer because of the paucity of relevant conclusive clinical trial results. We aimed to assess if mucinous adenocarcinoma (MUA) could be an indicator for the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer. Methods: Using SEER * Stat software V.8.3.5, eligible patients were then recruited from the SEER database. A χ 2 test was applied to compare the distribution of different categorical variables between nonmucinous adenocarcinoma (NMUA) and MUA groups. We then used the Kaplan-Meier method to analyze overall survival (OS) of different histological types in stage II colon cancer, and the log-rank test was then used to assess the OS differences. The Cox proportional regression risk models were also built in our analyses to eliminate potential crossed bias from other prognostic factors. Results: A total of 50,065 patients diagnosed with stage II colon cancer were recruited from the SEER database from 2004 to 2011; all the patients were divided into two groups, including NMUA (n = 44,785) and MUA (n = 5,280). The Cox analysis of the histological type indicated that the survival difference between MUA and NMUA failed to reach statistical significance in stage II colon cancer (P = 0.360). In NMUA, patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy were independently associated with 37.2% decreased risk of overall mortality compared with those not [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.628, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.601-1.656, P < 0.001]; in MUA, the number increased to 41.5% (HR = 0.585, 95% CI = 0.515-0.665, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Our study showed that the survival difference between MUA and NMUA failed to reach statistical significance in stage II colon cancer. More importantly, our study had provided the first evidence that chemotherapy would offer higher survival improvement in MUA compared with NMUA in stage II colon cancer; mucinous histology might be an indicator for enhanced survival benefit of chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer.