Seagrass meadows are considered to be among the most important marine ecosystems, with regard to both ecology and biodiversity and for the services they provide. Seven species occur in the Mediterranean Sea: Posidonia oceanica (the most common in the open sea), Cymodocea nodosa (particularly common in the eastern basin), Ruppia cirrhosa, R. maritima, Zostera marina and Zostera noltii (mainly in estuaries and brackish lagoons), and Halophila stipulacea (introduced from the Red Sea). Seagrass regression may be due to natural processes and/or natural or anthropogenic disturbances and stress. It can also be due to long-term climate trends, e.g., the post-Last Glacial Maximum rise in sea-level, the Little Ice Age (LIA) cooling and the post-LIA warming, resulting in possible misinterpretation. Human-induced losses of P. oceanica have been mainly related to coastal development, pollution, trawling, fish farming, moorings, dredging, dumping and introduced species. All other seagrasses have also undergone more or less dramatic regression events. In fact, accurate data are generally of very local value and they are lacking for most of the Mediterranean Sea. In the absence of a reliable baseline, some widely cited cases of regression are questionable. Relatively healthy P. oceanica meadows, whose limits have changed little since the 1950s, may thrive in highly anthropized areas. In addition, the decline of one species can benefit another, so that the overall seagrass balance may remain unchanged (e.g., Cymodocea replacing Posidonia). However, to conclude that everything is for the best would be erroneous. First, the lack of data supporting the general regression hypothesis does not invalidate the hypothesis. Indisputably dramatic seagrass losses have been documented (e.g., P. oceanica and Z. marina). Second, the Posidonia regression is irreversible at human scales, while other seagrasses can rapidly recover, and the expansion of some seagrasses (e.g., Cymodocea) cannot counterbalance, in terms of ecosystem services, the decline of the P. oceanica meadows. Third, human pressure (demography, tourism, etc.) on Mediterranean seagrass ecosystems is destined to strongly increase in the coming decades. Finally, the rise in sea-level due to global climate change will automatically induce a withdrawal of the lower limit of seagrass meadows whenever the limit is beyond the compensation depth. So the regression trend observed in Mediterranean seagrasses, even if it proves to be currently weaker than postulated, will significantly increase and become a major concern in the future. There is therefore an urgent need for the adoption of a set of efficient indicators and the setting up of a robust comparative baseline in order to draw up an accurate assessment of the losses and, for seagrasses other than Posidonia, possible gains at Mediterranean scale. In addition, seagrasses and seagrass habitats should be granted legal protection and, where such protection already exists, it should be implemented.
La posidonie (Posidonia oceanica) est une espèce protégée de plante à fleur sousmarine, endémique de la mer Méditerranée, qui constitue de vastes prairies entre la surface et 40 m de profondeur. Sur les plages de la région Provence Alpes Côte d'Azur, les amas de feuilles mortes de posidonies en bord de mer, appelés banquettes, sont à l'origine de conflits d'usage, obligeant les collectivités à trouver des modes de gestion permettant la préservation d'une espèce à haute valeur patrimoniale sans réduction de la valeur touristique de leurs plages. En effet, les banquettes remplissent de nombreuses fonctions écologiques. Elles protègent contre l'érosion, en préservant la plage de l'assaut des vagues et en facilitant le piégeage de nouveaux arrivages de sable. Elles constituent un écosystème de type litière, source de matière et d'énergie pour le milieu côtier et l'arrière de plage via le réseau trophique détritique. Or ces amas de feuilles mortes peuvent être considérés comme un déchet, conduisant les collectivités littorales à les retirer. La posidonie étant une espèce protégée, la destruction de ses feuilles, même mortes, est interdite. C'est pourquoi différents modes de gestion des banquettes ont été développés par les communes pour concilier les attentes touristiques avec les enjeux environnementaux et économiques liés à la fréquentation des plages. Ainsi, les banquettes peuvent être laissées en place, stockées, déplacées sur une partie de plage, réimmergées, remaniées sous forme de "millefeuille", etc. L'objet de cette étude est de réaliser une mise à jour de l'état des lieux des pratiques en matière de gestion des banquettes de posidonies et de préciser les coûts qui y sont liés. Dans ce cadre, des entretiens ont été menés avec 30 communes littorales de la région Provence Alpes Côte d'Azur. Ces échanges ont permis d'aborder les avantages et inconvénients de chaque mode de gestion.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.