He has lectured extensively nationally and abroad and holds leadership roles with the American Heart Association and American Academy of Pediatrics. He is considered a leader in the field of sudden cardiac arrest and sudden cardiac death in children. In this work, he has launched a national program to teach warning signs of sudden cardiac death in youth and to expand access to automated external defibrillators. His other clinical and research interests include congenital heart disease, pulmonary hypertension, heart failure, and interventional cardiac catheterization in children.
Hypothesis: We hypothesized that a single regimen of no or limited diuretics post-discharge after pediatric cardiac surgery for patients with two ventricles is not inferior to prolonged diuretics for prevention of readmission for pleural effusion.Material and Methods: A prospective, one-armed, safety non-inferiority trial with historical controls was performed at a single center, quaternary, children's hospital. Inclusion criteria were children aged 3 months to 18 years after pediatric cardiac surgery resulting in a two-ventricle repair between 7/2020 and 7/2021. Eligible patients were compared with patients from a ve-year historical period (selected using a database search). The intervention was that "regular risk" patients received no diuretics and pre-speci ed "high risk" patients received ve days of twice per day furosemide at discharge.Results: 61 subjects received the intervention. None were readmitted for pleural effusions, though 1 subject was treated for a symptomatic pleural effusion with outpatient furosemide. The study was halted after an interim analysis demonstrated that 4 subjects were readmitted with pericardial effusion during the study period versus 2 during the historical control (2.9% versus 0.2%, p = 0.003).Conclusions: We found no evidence that limited post-discharge diuretics results in an increase in readmissions for pleural effusions. This conclusion is limited as not enough subjects were enrolled to de nitively show that this strategy is not inferior to the historical practice. There was a small, but statistically signi cant, increase in readmissions for pericardial effusions after implementation of this study protocol.
Hypothesis: We hypothesized that a single regimen of no or limited diuretics post-discharge after pediatric cardiac surgery for patients with two ventricles is not inferior to prolonged diuretics for prevention of readmission for pleural effusion. Material and Methods: A prospective, one-armed, safety non-inferiority trial with historical controls was performed at a single center, quaternary, children’s hospital. Inclusion criteria were children aged 3 months to 18 years after pediatric cardiac surgery resulting in a two- ventricle repair between 7/2020 and 7/2021. Eligible patients were compared with patients from a five-year historical period (selected using a database search). The intervention was that “regular risk” patients received no diuretics and pre-specified “high risk” patients received five days of twice per day furosemide at discharge. Results: 61 subjects received the intervention. None were readmitted for pleural effusions, though 1 subject was treated for a symptomatic pleural effusion with outpatient furosemide. The study was halted after an interim analysis demonstrated that 4 subjects were readmitted with pericardial effusion during the study period versus 2 during the historical control (2.9% versus 0.2%, p = 0.003). Conclusions: We found no evidence that limited post-discharge diuretics results in an increase in readmissions for pleural effusions. This conclusion is limited as not enough subjects were enrolled to definitively show that this strategy is not inferior to the historical practice. There was a small, but statistically significant, increase in readmissions for pericardial effusions after implementation of this study protocol.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.