O ensino centrado no professor ainda é amplamente abordado na maioria das Instituições de Ensino Superior brasileiras. Este método não prioriza a participação ativa do aluno no processo de construção do conhecimento. O objetivo desta pesquisa foi conhecer as experiências de aprendizagem consideradas mais significativas pelos acadêmicos de odontologia. Foi realizada uma pesquisa quantitativa, com análise descritiva e analítica utilizando questionário previamente testado. A amostra foi composta por 274 acadêmicos, regularmente matriculados no ano de 2014. Do total de alunos, 209 (76,3%) era do sexo feminino, com média de idade de 21,3±2,5 anos. Os resultados demonstraram que a estratégia de ensino que mais colaborou para a aprendizagem do aluno foram as atividades desenvolvidas em aulas práticas (186, 67,9%), contribuindo, segundo 171 (92,3%) alunos, de maneira intensa para sua formação. A segunda estratégia de ensino mais citada foi a participação em projetos de extensão (17, 6,2%). Observou-se tendência na preferência pelas atividades extraclasse entre acadêmicos do sexo feminino. Não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa entre o tipo de estratégia de ensino e idade (p=0,211). Atividades em aulas práticas foram as que mais contribuíram para o aprendizado do acadêmico no âmbito universitário. Espera-se que os resultados deste estudo, em conjunto com as Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais, contribuam para a discussão sobre a necessidade de melhorias e inovação no ensino em odontologia.
Purpose: To assess feasibility and maintenance of bone after alveolar cleft reconstructions using graft from iliac crest and mandibular synthesis.Methods: 51 alveolar clefts grafted with iliac crest and 51 ones grafted with mandibular symphysis bones were selected from patients aged between 7 and 12 years. At three (T1) and 12 months (T2) after surgeries, periapical radiographs were performed to measure the height of the grafted bone based on the Bergland scale. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon tests compared differences between T1 and T2 according to each bone graft. Results: From the clefts grafted with mandibular symphysis bone, 47 were classified as type I (92.5%) and 04 as type II (7.84%) at T1. At T2, 36 were classified as type II (25.49%) and 02 as type III (3.92%). In the analysis of the clefts grafted with iliac crest at T1, 48 were classified as type I (94.11 %) and three as type II (5.88%). At T2, 37 classifieds as type I (72.54%), 12 as type II (23.52%) and two as type III (3.92%). There was no statistically significant difference between treatments.Conclusions: It was concluded that iliac crest and mandibular symphysis are adequate areas from which bone grafts can be obtained for reconstruction of alveolar cleft.
Purpose: To assess feasibility and maintenance of bone after alveolar cleft reconstructions using graft from iliac crest and mandibular synthesis.Methods: 51 alveolar clefts grafted with iliac crest and 51 ones grafted with mandibular symphysis bones were selected from patients aged between 7 and 12 years. At three (T1) and 12 months (T2) after surgeries, periapical radiographs were performed to measure the height of the grafted bone based on the Bergland scale. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon tests compared differences between T1 and T2 according to each bone graft.Results: From the clefts grafted with mandibular symphysis bone, 47 were classi ed as type I (92.5%) and 04 as type II (7.84%) at T1. At T2, 36 were classi ed as type II (25.49%) and 02 as type III (3.92%). In the analysis of the clefts grafted with iliac crest at T1, 48 were classi ed as type I (94.11 %) and three as type II (5.88%). At T2, 37 classi eds as type I (72.54%), 12 as type II (23.52%) and two as type III (3.92%).There was no statistically signi cant difference between treatments.Conclusions: It was concluded that iliac crest and mandibular symphysis are adequate areas from which bone grafts can be obtained for reconstruction of alveolar cleft.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.