HighlightsThis is the first meta-analysis of individual data in chronic Trypanosoma cruzi infection after treatment.The probability of seroreversion is variable along the course of follow-up.An interaction was found between age at treatment and country setting.The course of parasitological/molecular tests after treatment needs to be assessed.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the performance of the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) criteria in terms of earlier patients’ classification in comparison to the 1982/1997 ACR or the 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) criteria.Materials and methodsPatients from a Latin America, multiethnic, multicentre cohort, where SLE was defined using the physicians’ diagnosis, were included. To calculate the sensitivity of the 2019 EULAR/ACR criteria, the 1982/1997 ACR criteria were considered the gold standard. Additionally, comparison of the 1982/1997 ACR criteria and the 2012 SLICC criteria with the 2019 EULAR/ACR criteria was performed.ResultsThe sensitivity of the 2019 EULAR/ACR criteria when compared with the 1982/1997 ACR criteria as the gold standard was 91.3%. This new set of criteria allowed an earlier SLE patient classification in 7.4% (mean 0.67 years) and 0.6% (mean 1.47 years) than the 1982/1997 ACR and the 2012 SLICC criteria, respectively. Patients accruing the 2019 EULAR/ACR earlier than the 1982/1997 ACR criteria were more likely to have high anti-dsDNA titres; those accruing them later were less likely to have mucocutaneous and joint manifestations; this was not observed when comparing them with the 2012 SLICC criteria.ConclusionsThe 2019 EULAR/ACR criteria classified earlier only a small proportion of Latin America patients than with the two other criteria sets in real-life clinical practice scenarios. Further studies in different patient populations are needed before these new criteria are adopted worldwide.

Introduction: After more than 20 years of sustained work, the Latin American Group for the Study of Lupus (GLADEL) has made a significant number of contributions to the field of lupus, not only in the differential role that race/ethnicity plays in its course and outcome but also in several other studies including the beneficial effects of using antimalarials in lupus patients and the development of consensus guidelines for the treatment of lupus in our region. Methods: A new generation of “Lupus Investigators” in more than 40 centers throughout Latin America has been constituted in order to continue the legacy of the investigators of the original cohort and to launch a novel study of serum and urinary biomarkers in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Results: So far, we have recruited 807 patients and 631 controls from 42 Latin-American centers including 339 patients with SLE without renal involvement, 202 patients with SLE with prevalent but inactive renal disease, 176 patients with prevalent and active renal disease and 90 patients with incident lupus nephritis. Conclusions: The different methodological aspects of the GLADEL 2.0 cohort are discussed in this manuscript, including the challenges and difficulties of conducting such an ambitious project.

AimA decrease in proteinuria has been considered protective from renal damage in lupus nephritis (LN), but a cut-off point has yet to be established. The aim of this study was to identify the predictors of renal damage in patients with LN and to determine the best cut-off point for a decrease in proteinuria.MethodsWe included patients with LN defined clinically or histologically. Possible predictors of renal damage at the time of LN diagnosis were examined: proteinuria, low complement, anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies, red cell casts, creatinine level, hypertension, renal activity (assessed by the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI)), prednisone dose, immunosuppressive drugs and antimalarial use. Sociodemographic variables were included at baseline. Proteinuria was assessed at baseline and at 12 months, to determine if early response (proteinuria <0.8 g/day within 12 months since LN diagnosis) is protective of renal damage occurrence. Renal damage was defined as an increase of one or more points in the renal domain of The Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Damage Index (SDI). Cox regression models using a backward selection method were performed.ResultsFive hundred and two patients with systemic lupus erythematosus patients were included; 120 patients (23.9%) accrued renal damage during their follow-up. Early response to treatment (HR=0.58), antimalarial use (HR=0.54) and a high SES (HR=0.25) were protective of renal damage occurrence, whereas male gender (HR=1.83), hypertension (HR=1.86) and the renal component of the SLEDAI (HR=2.02) were risk factors for its occurrence.ConclusionsEarly response, antimalarial use and high SES were protective of renal damage, while male gender, hypertension and higher renal activity were risk factors for its occurrence in patients with LN.

Objective: To study the effects of halothane anesthesia in mice not undergoing surgery on elements of the inflammatory and stress response; this involved assessment of the phagocytic activity and respiratory burst of peritoneal macrophages as well as plasma corticosterone levels and peripheral leukocyte counts. Methods: There were 2 experimental groups, i.e. mice anesthetized with halothane 1.5% in oxygen for 40 min and a control group of mice subjected to the same manipulations but no anesthesia. At the end of the anesthetic or sham procedure, peritoneal macrophages were evaluated for phagocytic and lytic activity after an immune challenge and spontaneous respiratory burst (chemoluminiscence). Plasma corticosterone and leukocyte counts in peripheral blood were evaluated as indicators of the stress response. Results: In halothane-anesthetized mice, increased numbers and activity of phagocytic cells were found, with regard to the number of ingested and digested particles, compared to the nonanesthetized group. The ex vivo peritoneal macrophage respiratory burst without antigenic stimulation also showed a higher response in anesthetized mice compared with the nonanesthetized controls. Halothane administration did not alter corticosterone levels. Treated and control mice displayed similar leukocyte profiles in peripheral blood, except for lower lymphocyte counts in the controls compared to the halothane group. Typical correlation between corticosterone and leukocyte subsets, together with a high positive correlation between plasma corticosterone and phagocytic cell counts, were found only in the control group. Conclusion: Halothane anesthesia might have beneficial effects on the inflammatory response mediated by phagocytes, namely the activity and efficiency of peritoneal macrophages, in a setting where plasma corticosterone and peripheral leukocyte counts were not affected.