This paper seeks to quantify the magnitude of caesarean sections in Mexican public health-care institutions in recent years, to characterize the evolution of caesarean section rates (CSR) during the last decade, and to estimate the possible economic cost caused by the excess of caesareans performed in these institutions. The study is based on data obtained from the health sector, both for Mexico in the 5-year period 1993-97 and for the Mexican State of Jalisco between 1983 and 1998. Linear regression analysis was used to evaluate time series, and "excess of caesareans" was considered the number of caesarean deliveries performed above the admissible 15% CSR. The results reflect that on the national level, more than one-quarter of the deliveries handled by public institutions ended in caesarean section for each analyzed year, and if the deliveries performed in private institutions are included, the national rate is around 30%. A marked increase in CSR can be observed in Jalisco between 1983 and 1998 (almost 50%); and the cost for the nation of this CSR excess in financial terms is highly significant: several millions of dollars--obtained from public funds--are spent annually and unnecessarily by health services. The findings suggest that the increase in CSR is a public health problem that has not been satisfactorily faced by the health sector authorities. Many unnecessary caesareans would undoubtedly be avoided if the policies of these public health-care institutions were to consider, as a priority, both the known higher risk implicit in a caesarean for the health of the mother and child, and the economic impact on the country and its health institutions of the excessive number of caesareans performed yearly.
We examined the association between exposure to the California Tobacco Control Program and tobacco-related behaviors and perceptions among adults of Mexican descent. Three cross-sectional population-based surveys were conducted among adults in cities that represent full, partial, and no exposure to the program: San Diego, Calif, Tijuana, Mexico, and Guadalajara, Mexico, respectively. After we controlled for socioeconomic differences, we found significantly different rates of smoking, exposure to environmental tobacco smoke, and smoking bans in the 3 cities. We also observed a parallel gradient of cross-city differences in theoretical mediators of tobacco control. This suggests a significant association among the California Tobacco Control Program, tobacco-control outcomes, and theoretical mediators of these outcomes. Similar programs should be implemented in other regions; they have widespread effects on social norms and behaviors related to smoking and environmental tobacco smoke and can help achieve tobacco control across nations.
Resumo Realizou- Mexico, 31.8% in Colombia, and 8.1% in Brazil). The ratio for deaths by homicide for both sexes was 9.1 in Colombia, 4.4 in Brazil and 1.6
Individual and environmental factors play a protective role by increasing the likelihood of smoking bans in the home of Mexican-descent individuals. These factors should be considered for the design of interventions to sustain and promote the adoption of smoking bans in the home among this and other populations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.