This study examined absorption properties of 2-styrylpyridine, trans-2-(m-cyanostyryl)pyridine, trans-2-[3-methyl-(m-cyanostyryl)]pyridine, and trans-4-(m-cyanostyryl)pyridine compounds based on theoretical UV/Vis spectra, with comparisons between time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) using B3LYP, PBE0, and LC-ωPBE functionals. Basis sets 6-31G(d), 6-31G(d,p), 6-31+G(d,p), and 6-311+G(d,p) were tested to compare molecular orbital energy values, gap energies, and maxima absorption wavelengths. UV/Vis spectra were calculated from fully optimized geometry in B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) in gas phase and using the IEFPCM model. B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) provided the most stable form, a planar structure with parameters close to 2-styrylpyridine X-ray data. Isomeric structures were evaluated by full geometry optimization using the same theory level. Similar energetic values were found: ~4.5 kJ mol(-1) for 2-styrylpyridine and ~1 kJ mol(-1) for derivative compound isomers. The 2-styrylpyridine isomeric structure differed at the pyridine group N-atom position; structures considered for the other compounds had the cyano group attached to the phenyl ring m-position equivalent. The energy difference was almost negligible between m-cyano-substituted molecules, but high energy barriers existed for cyano-substituted phenyl ring torsion. TD-DFT appeared to be robust and accurate approach. The B3LYP functional with the 6-31G(d) basis set produced the most reliable λmax values, with mean errors of 0.5 and 12 nm respect to experimental values, in gas and solution, respectively. The present data describes effects on the λmax changes in the UV/Vis absorption spectra of the electron acceptor cyano substituent on the phenyl ring, the electron donor methyl substituent, and the N-atom position on the electron acceptor pyridine ring, causing slight changes respect to the 2-styrylpyridine title compound.
Optical and X-ray diffraction characterizations of crystals I and II of (2Z)-2-(4-bromophenyl)-3-[4-(dimethylamino)phenyl]prop-2-enenitrile (Z-4-BrPhDMAPhACN) are reported. I and II belong to the same monoclinic space group and have nearly identical unit-cell dimensions [I: a = 11.0169(2); b = 6.02041(11); c = 21.8541(4); (β) 98.4082(18). II: a = 11.0475(6); b = 6.0273(3); c = 21.8533(11); (β) 98.315(5)]. Crystals I and II were formed under different conditions and have different crystal habits and colors: crystals I are yellow blocks, whereas crystals II are small, orange needles.I and II show absorption maxima (λ abs ) in solution at 404 nm and emission (λ em ) maxima at 501 nm (I) and at 502 nm (II). However, their emission maxima are different in the solid state: I shows an emission at 512 nm and a shoulder at 534 nm, whereas II exhibits a λ em maximum at 582 nm. The differences in solid-state photoluminescence were attributed to variations in the crystal morphology and to the crystal habit and size. Both I and II were characterized by nuclear magnetic resonance, mass spectrometry, infrared spectroscopy, UV−vis spectroscopy, fluorescence, cyclic voltammetry, single-crystal and powder X-ray diffraction, differential scanning calorimetry, scanning electron microscopy, and density functional theory calculations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.