Background:Severe toxicity is experienced by a substantial minority of patients receiving fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy, with approximately 20% of these severe toxicities attributable to polymorphisms in the DPYD gene. The DPYD codes for the enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) important in the metabolism of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. We questioned whether prospective DPYD mutation analysis in all patients commencing such therapy would prove more cost-effective than reactive testing of patients experiencing severe toxicity.Methods:All patients experiencing severe toxicity from fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy for colorectal cancer in an Irish private hospital over a 3-year period were tested for 4 DPYD polymorphisms previously associated with toxicity. The costs associated with an index admission for toxicity in DPD-deficient patients were examined. A cost analysis was undertaken comparing the anticipated cost of implementing screening for DPYD mutations versus current usual care. One-way sensitivity analysis was conducted on known input variables. An alternative scenario analysis from the perspective of the Irish health-care payer (responsible for public hospitals) was also performed.Results:Of 134 patients commencing first-line fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy over 3 years, 30 (23%) patients developed grade 3/4 toxicity. Of these, 17% revealed heterozygote DPYD mutations. The cost of hospitalization for the DPYD-mutated patients was €232 061, while prospectively testing all 134 patients would have cost €23 718. Prospective testing would result in cost savings across all scenarios.Conclusions:The cost of hospital admission for severe chemotherapy-related toxicity is significantly higher than the cost of prospective DPYD testing of each patient commencing fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy.

The efficacies of several antimalarial drugs in the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria were compared, during an open, randomized trial, in New Halfa, eastern Sudan. The 96 patients who completed the 28 days of follow-up were treated with chloroquine (N = 26), sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (N = 38) or quinine (N = 32). No treatment failures were observed among the patients given sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine. Only 23.1% of the patients given chloroquine showed adequate clinical response, however, the rest showing early (15.4%) or, more frequently, late (61.5%) treatment failure. In terms of parasitological failure, 54.1% of the patients given chloroquine showed early RI resistance, 7.7% showed late RI, and 15.1% showed RIII. Most (90.6%) of the patients treated with quinine had adequate treatment responses, the rest having late treatment failures (and late RI). The frequency of treatment failure was significantly higher, however, among the patients given chloroquine than in the quinine-treatment arm. The present results and those of earlier investigations indicate that the problem of chloroquine resistance is worsening in eastern Sudan, and that the use of chloroquine as the first-line drug for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in this area is now compromised. The response to quinine may also be faltering.

3627 Background: DPD is an enzyme encoded by the DPYD gene involved in the metabolism of the chemotherapy drug 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and the oral 5FU prodrug capecitabine. Patients (pts) with DPYD mutations are at risk of severe toxicities from standard dose 5FU, although they may safely receive lower dose therapy with careful monitoring and dose escalation. Methods: In this retrospective study we identified all pts starting 5FU-based chemotherapy for colorectal cancer (CRC) at our institution between Jan 1 2010 and Dec 31 2012. During this time DPD testing was usually performed in a reactive manner, typically for pts experiencing severe toxicities. We reviewed the charts of pts who tested positive for DPYD mutations and assessed the financial implications of their hospitalizations with toxicity. These costs were compared to the costs which would have incurred if all pts starting such therapy had been proactively tested. Results: A total of 134 pts started first-line 5FU-based chemotherapy for CRC over the study period, 66 in the adjuvant setting and 68 for metastatic disease. 31 pts had DPYD mutation testing performed. 6 tests (19% of those tested, 4.5% of the total population) revealed heterozygote DPYD mutations. 5 pts had already experienced severe treatment-related toxicity resulting in cessation of therapy, while one was tested prospectively and received chemotherapy with dose reduction ab initio. The total cost related to hospitalization with toxicity for these 5 pts was €155,083. At €177 per test, the cost to prospectively test all pts starting first-line 5FU-based therapy over the time period would have been €23,718 representing a saving of €131,365 through avoiding these admissions alone. 4 pts who tested positive for DPYD mutations were receiving adjuvant therapy and none restarted therapy following severe toxicity early in their therapy. 2 pts subsequently relapsed with metastatic disease. Conclusions: Prospective testing for DPYD mutations in pts with CRC starting 5FU-based therapy for the first time represents a considerable cost-saving opportunity, in addition to potentially avoiding prolonged hospitalization and morbidity for a sizeable minority of pts.

The importance of developing local guidelines for rational antibiotic usage is highlighted.

No abstract