Background The PERMA Model, as a positive psychology conceptual framework, has increased our understanding of the role of Positive emotion, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, and Achievements in enhancing human potentials, performance and wellbeing. We aimed to assess the utility of PERMA as a multidimensional model of positive psychology in reducing physician burnout and improving their well-being. Methods Eligible studies include peer-reviewed English language studies of randomized control trials and non-randomized design. Attending physicians, residents, and fellows of any specialty in the primary, secondary, or intensive care setting comprised the study population. Eligible studies also involved positive psychology interventions designed to enhance physician well-being or reduce physician burnout. Using free text and the medical subject headings we searched CINAHL, Ovid PsychINFO, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar (GS) electronic bibliographic databases from 2000 until March 2020. We use keywords for a combination of three general or block of terms (Health Personnel OR Health Professionals OR Physician OR Internship and Residency OR Medical Staff Or Fellow) AND (Burnout) AND (Positive Psychology OR PERMA OR Wellbeing Intervention OR Well-being Model OR Wellbeing Theory). Results Our search retrieved 1886 results (1804 through CINAHL, Ovid PsychINFO, MEDLINE, and 82 through GS) before duplicates were removed and 1723 after duplicates were removed. The final review included 21 studies. Studies represented eight countries, with the majority conducted in Spain (n = 3), followed by the US (n = 8), and Australia (n = 3). Except for one study that used a bio-psychosocial approach to guide the intervention, none of the other interventions in this review were based on a conceptual model, including PERMA. However, retrospectively, ten studies used strategies that resonate with the PERMA components. Conclusion Consideration of the utility of PERMA as a multidimensional model of positive psychology to guide interventions to reduce burnout and enhance well-being among physicians is missing in the literature. Nevertheless, the majority of the studies reported some level of positive outcome regarding reducing burnout or improving well-being by using a physician or a system-directed intervention. Albeit, we found more favorable outcomes in the system-directed intervention. Future studies are needed to evaluate if PERMA as a framework can be used to guide system-directed interventions in reducing physician burnout and improving their well-being.

Background:Treatment-resistant schizophrenia is prevalent and difficult to manage, as patients fail multiple antipsychotic trials before being considered as treatment-resistant. Currently clozapine is the only Food and Drug Administration-approved pharmacotherapy for treatment-resistant schizophrenia but remains under-prescribed. The purpose of this study is to investigate recent literature on clozapine in order to identify barriers to prescribing clozapine and categorize the recommended solutions.Methods:We conducted a systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Using free text and the medical subject headings, we searched MEDLINE/PubMed electronic bibliographic database from 2017 until 2020. Eligible studies included peer-reviewed English language articles with multiple methodologies aiming to identify clozapine barriers in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. We used search terms combining clozapine AND treatment OR treatment-resistant schizophrenia AND barriers AND prescribing OR prescription OR prescriber. We merged search results in a citation manager software, removed duplicates, and screened the remaining articles based on the study eligibility criteria.Results:We retrieved 123 studies, however, only 10 articles exclusively met the study inclusion criteria for full text review. These studies represented 20 countries; 6 were exclusively conducted in the US. The top barriers delineated by the studies include: providers’ lack of knowledge and training (n = 7), concern about side effects (n = 8), and poor adherence (n = 7). All studies described more than 1 barrier. Other barriers included prescriber-perceived barriers (n = 4), administrative barriers (n = 5), and other healthcare systems-related barriers (n = 3). Top recommendations to overcome clozapine prescription barriers included improving prescriber clozapine education/training, utilizing interdisciplinary teams and providing integrated care via clozapine clinics, and simplifying blood test monitoring.Conclusion:Clozapine remains under-prescribed for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia due to multiple barriers related to the individual prescriber, system of care, and technology. It is recommended that by improving prescriber knowledge and training, use of integrated care, and use of technology that can enable continuous, real-time blood test monitoring, these barriers may be overcome.

Primarily we aimed to examine the crude and standardized schizophrenia hospitalization trend from 2005 to 2014. We hypothesized that there will be a statistically significant linear trend in hospitalization rates for schizophrenia from 2005 to 2014. Secondarily we also examined trends in hospitalization by race/ethnicity, age, gender, as well as trends in hospitalization Length of Stay (LOS) and inflation adjusted cost. In this observational study, we used Nationwide Inpatient Sample data and International Classification of Diseases, Eleventh Revisions codes for Schizophrenia, which revealed 6,122,284 cases for this study. Outcomes included crude and standardized hospitalization rates, race/ethnicity, age, cost, and LOS. The analysis included descriptive statistics, indirect standardization, Rao-Scott Chi-Square test, t -test, and adjusted linear regression trend. Hospitalizations were most prevalent for individuals ages 45–64 (38.8%), African Americans were overrepresented (25.8% of hospitalizations), and the gender distribution was nearly equivalent. Mean LOS was 9.08 days (95% confidence interval 8.71–9.45). Medicare was the primary payer for most hospitalizations (55.4%), with most of the costs ranging from $10,000-$49,999 (57.1%). The crude hospitalization rates ranged from 790–1142/100,000 admissions, while the US 2010 census standardized rates were 380–552/100,000 from 2005–2014. Linear regression trend analysis showed no significant difference in trend for race/ethnicity, age, nor gender ( P > .001). The hospitalizations’ overall rates increased while LOS significantly decreased, while hospitalization costs and Charlson's co-morbidity index increased ( P < .001). From 2005–2014, the overall US hospitalization rates significantly increased. Over this period, observed disparities in hospitalizations for middle-aged and African Americans were unchanged, and LOS has gone down while costs have gone up. Further studies addressing the important disparities in race/ethnicity and age and reducing costs of acute hospitalization are needed.

No abstract

No abstract