The main feature of social and economic rights is that their implementation requires governmental assistance and control for realization. Therefore, the stance on the present category of rights and freedoms is quite ambiguous. Scientific analysis and generalization of actual variety of socio-economic rights are complicated with the fact the classification of considered categories of rights cannot be based on emphasizing one and only criterion. The main goal of this paper is the studying of legal content and issues of classification of social and economic rights of man. To reach this goal authors have used analysis methods. Having analyzed works of Belova-Ganeva G. it was elicited the essence of socio-economic rights lays in the fact ʽthey help to reduce unjustified social differences and provide individual with the possibility of getting benefits or services and having state supportʽ. The variety of rights’ content comprising the present group results in the situation when the same right, in virtue of various grounds, can be attributed to two or more classified groups. The difference between goals becomes visible within the process of normative setting of separate socio-economic rights and when subjects exercise them. Correspondingly, in the present work authors distinguish rights in the sphere of property and economic activity for one group, while the second group includes rights in the sphere of social security and social insurance.

This study aims at verifying relationships between the perception of medico-legal risks involved in the professional activity of Republic of Kazakhstan healthcare professionals (HCPs), defensive medical behavior and their understanding of healthcare professional liability (HCPL) insurance. The current paper also analyzes the experience of some foreign countries based on a study which suggests the ways of improving the medical liability, defensive medicine and introduction to HCPL insurance in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Additionally, the identified advantages to introduction insurance and mediation as an extra-judicial regulation of disputes, the authors point out the identified shortcomings of the matter in the legal acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Relevance of the topic is reasoned to the fact that complaints about medical malpractice have increased over time in Kazakhstan, as well as other countries around the world. The costs arising from medical liability lawsuits weigh not only on individual HCPs but also on the budgets of healthcare facilities, many of which in Kazakhstan are supported by public funds. A full understanding of the phenomenon of medical malpractice appears necessary in order to manage this spreading issue and mechanism of HCPL insurance in the Republic of Kazakhstan.

The main feature of social and economic rights is that their implementation requires governmental assistance and control for realization. Therefore, the stance on the present category of rights and freedoms is quite ambiguous. Scientific analysis and generalization of actual variety of socio-economic rights are complicated with the fact the classification of considered categories of rights cannot be based on emphasizing one and only criterion. The main goal of this paper is the studying of legal content and issues of classification of social and economic rights of man. To reach this goal authors have used analysis methods. Having analyzed works of Belova-Ganeva G. it was elicited the essence of socio-economic rights lays in the fact ʽthey help to reduce unjustified social differences and provide individual with the possibility of getting benefits or services and having state supportʽ. The variety of rights’ content comprising the present group results in the situation when the same right, in virtue of various grounds, can be attributed to two or more classified groups. The difference between goals becomes visible within the process of normative setting of separate socio-economic rights and when subjects exercise them. Correspondingly, in the present work authors distinguish rights in the sphere of property and economic activity for one group, while the second group includes rights in the sphere of social security and social insurance.