NARIN, A. Is There a Link between Nickel Allergy and Coronary Stent Restenosis?Tohoku J. Exp. Med., 2005, 206 (3), [243][244][245][246] Although many patients with coronary artery disease are being treated by coronary stents, in-stent restenosis is the major limitation of percutaneous coronary stenting procedures. Most stents are made of stainless steel, and that, allergic reactions to nickel ions released from coronary stainless-steel stents may be one of the triggering mechanisms for in-stent restenosis. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between in-stent restenosis and nickel allergy in a prospective study. For this purpose, we applied epicutaneous patch test for nickel in 43 patients who had undergone elective intracoronary stent placement for stable angina pectoris in the day following stent placement and evaluated the presence of nickel allergy. Control angiography was performed at 6 months to determine in-stent restenosis. Three (6.9%) patients had allergic reaction to nickel and 16 (37%) patients had developed in-stent restenosis. One of the 3 patients with nickel allergy had diffuse in-stent restenosis and the others not. The present study therefore does not support the proposed relationship between nickel allergy and development of in-stent restenosis in patients having stainless steel stents. Large scale studies are needed to reach a final conclusion. coronary stenting; in-stent restenosis; metal allergy; nickel; patch test

No abstract

No abstract

SUMMARYDiabetic retinopathy (DR) is an early and frequent marker of other vascular complications of diabetes and its relation with coronary ischemia is known. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association between DR and indices of coronary artery disease (CAD) severity and extent determined by coronary angiography.Sixty-nine diabetic patients undergoing coronary angiography for suspected CAD were evaluated. The severity and extent of CAD were scored from coronary angiograms by using 3 scores. Retinopathy was graded by fundus examination.There were differences in the severity score, extent score, number of vessels with disease, duration of diabetes, diabetes therapy, history of previous myocardial infarction (MI), and serum creatinine level among patients with and without DR. CAD severity was associated with the presence of DR (r: 0.53, P < 0.001), grade of DR (r: 0.52, P < 0.001), duration of diabetes (r: 0.28, P: 0.019), history of previous MI (r: 0.36, P: 0.002); and serum creatinine level (r: 0.24, P: 0.049) where the presence of DR was the only independent factor related to the severity score in multivariate analysis (r: 0.48, P < 0.001). The parameters related to the extent score were the presence of DR (r: 0.50, P < 0.001); grade of DR (r: 0.48, P < 0.001); previous MI (r: 0.37, P: 0.002) and age of the patient (r: 0.26, P: 0.033). Factors independently related to the extent score in multivariate analysis were the presence of DR (r: 0.37, P: 0.001), previous MI (r: 0.30, P: 0.006), and age of the patient (r: 0.22, P: 0.003).Among diabetics who are suspected of having CAD, those with retinopathy have more diffuse and severe coronary atherosclerosis, compared with diabetics without retinopathy. This cannot be explained by a longer duration or inferior control of the disease. (Int Heart J 2005; 46: 639-646)

SUMMARYAn attenuated heart rate recovery (HRR) immediately after exercise has been shown to be predictive of mortality. It is not known whether HRR predicts mortality when measured in patients with heart failure. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the ability of HRR to predict mortality in patients with heart failure.We studied 84 NYHA class II or III chronic congestive heart failure patients who had a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40%. All patients underwent symptom limited cardiopulmonary exercise testing. The value for the HRR was defined as the difference in heart rate between peak exercise and one-minute later; a value ≤ 18 beats per minute was considered abnormal. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the value of HRR. Those with abnormal HRR were assigned to group I and those with normal HRR were assigned to group II. The 2 groups were compared with each other regarding baseline characteristics and exercise capacity assessed by peak VO 2 .There were 26 patients (31%) in group I and 58 patients (69%) in group II. Group II patients had better performance on treadmill exercise testing than group I patients. They had greater exercise duration (7.5 ± 3.8 minutes versus 5 ± 3.5 minutes, P = 0.006), better heart-rate reserve (79 ± 25% versus 63 ± 27%, P = 0.01), and higher values of maximal heart-rate (141 ± 18 beats/min versus 132 ± 17 beats/min, P = 0.04). Group II patients also had higher peak VO 2 values (16.8 ± 4.4 mL/kg/min versus 14.4 ± 3.6 mL/ kg/min, P = 0.01). When we separated the groups according to beta-blocker usage, betablockers had no prominent effect on HRR.In the follow-up period (mean 14.1 ± 6.1 months), the presence of abnormal HRR and lower peak VO 2 (≤ 14 mL/kg/min) were the only significant predictors of mortality in our patient population (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 5.2, 95% CI, 1.3 to 24, P = 0.03 and adjusted HR 13, 95% CI, 2.1 to 25.6, P = 0.005, respectively).It seems that the attenuated HRR value one minute after peak exercise appears to be a reliable index of the severity of exercise intolerance in heart failure patients and this study supports the value of HRR as a prognostic marker among heart failure patients referred for cardiopulmonary exercise testing for prediction of prognosis. (Int Heart J 2006; 47: 431-440)