The efficiency of semi-dry electrophoretic transfer after sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-electrophoresis using PhastGel media was investigated in a model system using three isotope labelled proteins. To give a full picture of the blotting process the amount of protein present in the gel, membranes, and filter papers was determined after different transfer times. The influence of the transfer buffer, commonly used additives such as methanol and SDS, and several different immobilizing matrices was investigated. Soybean trypsin inhibitor, bovine serum albumin, and ferritin were used as model proteins to study the effect of size on transfer efficiency. Basically, all three stages of the blotting process decide the result; the elution of protein from the gel, the immobilization of protein to the membrane, and the loss of material from the membrane during transfer. A theoretical explanation for the observed poor binding to a second membrane is discussed. Our results show that the buffer composition has little influence on the efficiency of transfer from the gel, but can be significant to the binding capacity of the membrane. In all experiments performed, there was never one moment during the transfer when all protein was eluted from the gel and simultaneously still bound to the membrane. The highest recovery in the membrane was obtained at different time intervals for different proteins. This indicates that quantitative transfer procedures cannot be generalized. However, obtaining an optimal method for reliable quantification of a specific protein or group of proteins is possible. For general protein staining of nitrocellulose and polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, a highly sensitive silver staining method requiring only 15 min has been used.
An improved procedure, "thermoblotting", is described for transferring proteins by diffusion from PhastGel Gradient media to an immobilizing matrix after horizontal sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. After electrophoresis the gels were left on the separation bed of PhastSystem, the blotting matrix was applied and a transfer temperature was selected between 5-70 degrees C. An experimental series at fixed diffusion times showed that the transfer yield was significantly increased with temperature. The evaluation was done visually after staining of the blots with colloidal gold. An evaluation study comparing nitrocellulose, nylon, and polyvinylidenedifluoride of different pore sizes is also reported. Finally, the transfer efficiencies for 125I-labelled bovine serum albumin and soybean trypsin inhibitor were estimated using four different blotting procedures: two diffusion blotting techniques and two electrophoretic blotting techniques (tank vs. semi-dry).
The development of equipment for fast automated staining is described. It is possible to handle staining procedures with up to 20 steps and nine different solutions. To increase the reaction rate in the reaction chamber, the gels are rotated and high temperatures are used. The temperature in the reaction chamber is controlled between room temperature and 50 degrees C. Increased temperature, above 20 degrees C, generally results in faster staining and destaining. However, some reactions proceed better at a low temperature, including fixation of proteins with TCA, and the development step in silver staining, where increased temperatures cause a high background stain. Silver staining using acidic silver nitrate solution is preferred, due to easy preparation and good storage stability of the reagents. This method also causes little precipitation of silver on the walls of the reaction chamber. Silver staining is accomplished within one hour. Staining with PhastGel Blue is accomplished within 30 min.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.