Postgraduates being as the backbone of the innovative talent team, the enhancement of postgraduates’ innovative behavior has become the focus of higher education reform in the new era. Postgraduate students’ innovative behaviors are influenced by multiple factors, and mentorship plays a crucial role in the cultivation of postgraduate students’ innovative behaviors. This study is based on social cognitive theory and empirical analysis from the perspective of individual postgraduate students and mentorship cultivation. Multisource data were obtained from a research team attending a teacher training college in southwest China, and a questionnaire survey was conducted on 362 postgraduate students based on an online approach. The empirical study was conducted using SPSS software and AMOS software combined with hierarchical regression analysis and structural analysis of covariance to examine the mechanism of the effect of transformational tutoring style on postgraduate students’ innovative behavior, using creative self-efficacy as a mediating variable. The results showed that the transformational tutoring style had a significant positive effect on the innovation behavior of postgraduate students, and the creative self-efficacy partially mediated the effect of the transformational tutoring style on the innovation behavior. According to the findings of the study, the creative self-efficacy of postgraduate students is enhanced through the collaboration of “multiple” subjects; the “integrated” cultivation model is built to create a transformative tutor team; a mentoring community is established. The study is aimed at providing a reference for the cultivation of innovation ability of master students.

No abstract

Background: There are conflicting reports on the prevalence of ASDs in mainland China (China thereafter) and abroad, and no scholars have compared the prevalence in China and abroad. Further studies are needed to clarify the changes in the prevalence rate and compare the prevalence rates at home and abroad. Objective: In order to compare the prevalence of autism at home and abroad, and compare diagnostic tools, diagnostic criteria and other aspects. So far, no scholar has compared the prevalence of autism in China and abroad. Chinese scholars have hardly studied the comprehensive prevalence in China, and the prevalence of autism is conflicting. Methods: I used the Meta-analysis to carry out the research. Firstly, literature was retrieved according to key words and extracted according to screening criteria. Secondly, forest plots and funnel plots were drawn to analyze their significance and heterogeneity. Results: Based on diagnostic criteria the pooled prevalence of ASDs, 73.6 per 10,000 in China (95% CI: 14.22-77.96 per 10,000 I 2 = 80.95%), and 98.8 per 10,000 abroad (95% CI: 22.35-127.04 per 10000 per 98.14%, I 2 = 98.14%). Subgroup analyses revealed significant difference in the prevalence of ASDs between genders. Moreover, the prevalence of males far exceeds that of females both in China and abroad. Conclusion: There are significant differences in the prevalence of autism at home and abroad, and there are also large differences in diagnostic criteria and diagnostic tools. There are significant differences between developing regions and underdeveloped regions, and there are also differences in the prevalence of autism between different genders, but the differences are not significant. In addition, the number of people suffering from autism may gradually increase in the future, and the number of people who understand autism will become wider and wider, the aging phenomenon of autism will gradually increase, and the causes of autism will become more and more complicated.

No abstract