Background: Thoracoscopic resection of small pulmonary nodules (SPNs) is challenging. Accurate preoperative computed tomography-guided localization of SPNs is key to successful rection. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical value of a novel localization needle and methylene blue staining combined with surgical glue (MBSG) and to explore the risk factors for post-localization complications. Methods: This prospective, non-randomized controlled study was conducted on 110 patients who received either MBSG or novel needle localization prior to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) from January 2019 to December 2019 at Shenzhen People's Hospital. The primary endpoints were the safety and the success rates of the 2 localization techniques. The secondary endpoints were operative time and feasibility. Results: The 110 patients were categorized into 2 groups: the MBSG group (n=84) and the pulmonary nodule localization needle group (n=26). The success rate of pre-VATS localization was 100% in both groups. No deaths or serious complications occurred during localization. The rates of pneumothorax, pulmonary hemorrhage, and localization-induced cough were 38.1%, 25%, and 7.14%, respectively, in the MBSG group, and 26.92%, 19.23%, and 0%, respectively, in the pulmonary nodule localization needle group. Differences between the 2 groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). Total complication rate and the incidence of pain were significantly lower in the pulmonary nodule localization needle group (χ 2 =4.441 and 4.295, respectively; P<0.05). The difference in operative time between the 2 groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Dye diffusion occurred in 2 patients in the MBSG group; however, it had no impact on VATS or on the pathological analysis. Neither displacement nor dislocation was observed in the pulmonary nodule localization needle group. Logistic regression analysis showed that the localization technique was an independent risk factor for total complications (odds ratio: 2.634, 95% confidence interval: 1.022-6.789, P<0.05).Conclusions: Both techniques can localize SPNs effectively prior to VATS. The pulmonary nodule localization needle technique has a lower incidence of complications.
Background: Transarterial bland embolization (TABE) is widely used to treat the spontaneous rupture of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and can lead to ischemic necrosis of the tumor. In this study, we used the propensity-score matching (PSM) method to compare the initial responses of treatment-naïve HCC patients to TABE and drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE), and the safety of these treatments.Methods: Patients with treatment-naïve HCC, who had been admitted to 2 medical centers from January 2016 to December 2020, were enrolled as the research subjects. The data of 26 patients treated with TABE for ruptured HCC and 52 patients treated with DEB-TACE for primary HCC were collected according to our inclusion and exclusion criteria, and a PSM analysis was conducted to assess the safety and effectiveness of these two interventional techniques 1 month postoperatively.Results: In relation to ruptured HCC, TABE had a hemostatic success rate of 97.0%. Before PSM, the TABE group had a larger maximum tumor diameter (P<0.05), a higher proportion of multiple tumors (P<0.05), a higher proportion of Child-Pugh class B ( P<0.05), and a higher proportion of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B ( P<0.05) than the DEB-TACE group. After PSM, the baseline characteristics of these two groups were well balanced, and there was no significant difference in patients' initial therapeutic responses and tumor recurrence rates (both P>0.05). The multivariate regression analysis showed that tumor size was an independent predictor of the objective response rate (ORR) [odds ratio (OR): 3.312; 95% CI: 0.152-5.944; P<0.05]. Tumor number and BCLC stage also affected ORR; however, ORR was not significantly correlated with the interventional technique (TABE vs. DEB-TACE; P>0.05). The incidences of post-embolization syndrome (PES) and 48-h hepatotoxicity were significantly lower in the TABE group than the DEB-TACE group (both P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in hepatotoxicity after 1 month (P>0.05).
Background To summarize the incidence and management strategy of vascular lake (VL) during the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with CalliSpheres drug-eluting beads (DEBs), and to analyze its relationship with tumor response rate (RR). The etiology and clinical significance of VL were also analyzed based on the available literature. Methods The clinical data of 92 HCC patients who were treated with chemoembolization using CalliSpheres DEBs (DEB-TACE) in two centers were retrospectively analyzed. All 92 patients were treatment-naïve and treated by DEB-TACE. The incidence of VL and its clinical treatment during the first embolization session were summarized. The lesions were divided into a VL group and a non-VL group to analyze the relationship between VL and tumor RR. Results The embolization was successful in 98.9% of patients (91/92). A total of 33 VLs (18.4%; including 15 stable and 18 unstable VLs) were found among the 179 nodules treated. The unstable VLs were further embolized with embolic agent. One patient with unstable VL developed bleeding due to hepatic rupture and died. During the follow-up, residual tumors were found around 2 stable VLs, 2 lesions in 2 patients were treated with CT-guided radiofrequency ablation. The tumor RR was 84.4% in VL group, which was significantly higher than that (58.9%) in the non-VL group (P=0.007). Conclusions VL is a unique phenomenon during DEB-TACE. It may be accompanied by residual tumors and bleeding due to rupture. Therefore, VL should be cautiously managed in clinical practice.
Background To analyze the perioperative safety and effectiveness of chemoembolization with CalliSpheres drug-eluting beads (DEBs) loaded with irinotecan (DEBIRI) in the treatment of unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM). Methods The clinical data of 16 colorectal cancer patients with postoperative liver metastases who were treated with chemoembolization using DEBIRI in our center from March 2017 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The treatment responses 3 and 6 months after the chemoembolization was evaluated with the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). The clinical complications were recorded and graded. Changes in blood cells, liver function, and tumor marker were analyzed before treatment and during follow-up. Results A total of 46 DEBIRI sessions were performed in 16 patients. The success rate was 100.0%. The main postoperative complications included right upper quadrant pain (76.1%), hypertension (87.0%), nausea (89.1%), and vomiting (84.8%), which were grade 1 to 2 events; one patient suffered from acute cholecystitis (2.2%), a grade 3 event. According to mRECIST, the complete response rate, partial response rate, objective response rate, and disease control rate were 0.0%, 68.7%, 68.7%, and 100.0% 3 months after chemoembolization and 0.0%, 81.2%, 81.2%, and 93.7% 6 months after the intervention. As shown by blood biochemistry, the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) significantly differed before treatment and during follow-up (P<0.01), while blood cells and liver function showed no significant differences (all P>0.05). Conclusions In this preliminary clinical study, chemoembolization with DEBIRI is safe and effective in treating unresectable CRCLM. However, more prospective multicenter clinical trials with larger sample sizes are required to confirm our findings further.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.