The effect of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) on balance function in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) and the potential outcome predictive factors remains unclear. We retrospectively included 261 PD patients who underwent STN-DBS and finished the 1-month follow-up (M1) assessment in the explorative set for identifying postoperative balance change predictors, and 111 patients who finished both the M1 and 12-month follow-up (M12) assessment in the validation set for verifying the identified factors. Motor and balance improvement were evaluated through the UPDRS-III and the Berg balance scale (BBS) and pull test (PT), respectively. Candidate predictors of balance improvement included age, disease duration, motor subtypes, baseline severity of PD, cognitive status, motor and balance response to levodopa, and stimulation parameters. In the off-medication condition, STN-DBS significantly improved BBS and PT performance in both the M1 and M12, in both datasets. While in the on-medication condition, no significant balance improvement was observed. Higher preoperative BBS response to levodopa was significantly associated with larger postoperative off-medication, but not on-medication, BBS (p < 0.001) and PT (p < 0.001) improvement in both the M1 and M12. BBS subitems 8, 9, 11, 13, and 14 were the major contributors to the prediction of balance improvement after STN-DBS. STN-DBS improves short-term off-medication, but not on-medication, balance function assessed through BBS and PT. Preoperative BBS response to levodopa best predicts postoperative off-medication balance improvement. For patients who manifested severe balance problems, a levodopa challenge test on BBS or the short version of BBS is recommended.

No abstract

Background: Freezing of gait (FOG) is a common disabling symptom in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Cognitive impairment may contribute to FOG. Nevertheless, their correlations remain controversial. We aimed to investigate cognitive differences between PD patients with and without FOG (nFOG), explore correlations between FOG severity and cognitive performance and assess cognitive heterogeneity within the FOG patients. Methods: Seventy-four PD patients (41 FOG, 33 nFOG) and 32 healthy controls (HCs) were included. Comprehensive neuropsychological assessments testing cognitive domains of global cognition, executive function/attention, working memory, and visuospatial function were performed. Cognitive performance was compared between groups using independent t-test and ANCOVA adjusting for age, sex, education, disease duration and motor symptoms. The k-means cluster analysis was used to explore cognitive heterogeneity within the FOG group. Correlation between FOG severity and cognition were analyzed using partial correlations. Results: FOG patients showed significantly poorer performance in global cognition (MoCA, p < 0.001), frontal lobe function (FAB, p = 0.015), attention and working memory (SDMT, p < 0.001) and executive function (SIE, p = 0.038) than nFOG patients. The FOG group was divided into two clusters using the cluster analysis, of which cluster 1 exhibited worse cognition, and with older age, lower improvement rate, higher FOGQ3 score, and higher proportion of levodopa-unresponsive FOG than cluster 2. Further, in the FOG group, cognition was significantly correlated with FOG severity in MoCA (r = −0.382, p = 0.021), Stroop-C (r = 0.362, p = 0.030) and SIE (r = 0.369, p = 0.027). Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the cognitive impairments of FOG were mainly reflected by global cognition, frontal lobe function, executive function, attention and working memory. There may be heterogeneity in the cognitive impairment of FOG patients. Additionally, executive function was significantly correlated with FOG severity.