No abstract

Explanations for the association between educational attainment and the risk of dementia fall into three main categories. It may arise as an artefact of study methods; education may predict broader socioeconomic circumstances and exposures, or education may reflect brain reserve or cognitive capacity that protect against dementia. Data from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging (N=6646, giving 44,676 person-years of follow-up) are analyzed to test a series of hypotheses reflecting these explanations. Years of education showed a strong association with the risk of dementia (relative risk [RR] 2.1 for those with less than 6 years of education compared to those with 13 or more years; RR=2.9 among survivors). Possible artefactual factors were detected, but were insufficient to invalidate the association. Adjustments for a range of other socioeconomic indicators, health problems and lifestyle factors reduced, but did not remove, the association. Adjustments for intelligence and for an indicator of lifetime mental activity also appeared to account for some but not all of the association. The conclusion is that there appears to be a real association between educational attainment and the risk of dementia 50 to 60 years later; this influence appears to run through a number of different, and sometimes complementary, pathways.

Non-disclosure of deferrable risk has received little attention in the literature. We examined deferrable risk (history of intravenous drug use [IVDU]) and donor attitudes towards truthfulness, the screening process and interpretation of the screening question as well as risk profile. Donors negative for all markers with a self-reported history of IVDU (N = 30) and matched controls were identified from an anonymous mail-out survey. In a separate survey, hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive donors participated in a telephone interview, from which all those with IVDU history (N = 29) were selected plus matched controls (combined total 59 IVDU, 236 controls). IVDU donors, when compared with matched controls, tended to believe that it is OK not to answer truthfully if one believes that her/his blood is safe (18.6% vs. 4.7%) and that some questions are a little too personal (35.6% vs. 21.7%). IVDU donors were more likely than controls to say they failed to acknowledge screening questions appropriately (23% vs. 2.2%) or to agree that IVDU questions are mainly about recent drug taking or sharing needles (29% vs. 11%) even though the screening question asked about IVDU ever without any such qualifiers. IVDU donors were also more likely to have other lifestyle/risk factors such as history of sex with IVDU (45.5% vs. 1.7%). Donors with deferrable IVDU history may rationalise that revealing their status is not necessary and may misinterpret the question. Failure to acknowledge risk behaviour is complex, and some degree of non-disclosure may be an inherent part of pre-donation screening.

Most HCV-positive donors were born between 1945 and 1964, and the decline in HCV rates is associated primarily with this birth cohort. The key risk factors predicting HCV positivity did not change over the 13 years of the study. With approximately two-thirds of HCV-positive Canadians in the general population having been tested for HCV, potential donors may be aware of their HCV status and be likely to self-defer. This, and an increasing proportion of first-time donors born after 1964, may contribute to declining HCV rates in first-time donors.