No abstract

This study evaluated the reliability of three rating systems for total knee arthroplasty. Twenty-nine patients were assessed by six observers with the American Knee Society Score, the British Orthopaedic Association Score, and the Oxford 12-item questionnaire. The inter- and intraobserver variations were calculated for the American Knee Society Score and the British Orthopaedic Association Score, as was the reproducibility of the Oxford 1 2-item questionnaire. Components of the scores were evaluated for agreement using Kappa statistics. The British Orthopaedic Association Score had smaller interobserver variation compared to the American Knee Society Score, and the greatest reproducibility of the three systems. This was attributed to the equal weighting of its component variables. The Oxford 1 2-item questionnaire, a self-administered questionnaire that eliminates interobserver error, emerged as the most reliable system. Observer experience affected the reliability of the American Knee Society Score and the British Orthopaedic Association Score. Subjective variables were more reliable and reproducible than the objective components.

The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the use of predonation of autologous blood for the periacetabular osteotomy. We carried out a retrospective single surgeon series study looking at patient demographics, intraoperative blood loss, volume of red cells returned (by cell salvage and allogenic/autologous transfusion), and comparing pre- and postoperative haemoglobin levels in those that predonated and those that did not. One hundred and twenty-two procedures were performed on 107 patients between 1996 and 2005. An initial audit (22 procedures) revealed high wastage (45% returned) of allogenic blood. A predonation protocol was initiated and subsequently 100 procedures in 91 patients were performed. In 82 procedures, the patients were eligible for predonation. A total of 226 units of autologous blood were predonated and 92% was used. Only 13 of these patients (16%) required additional allogenic transfusion for unforeseen excessive blood loss intraoperatively. A set protocol for predonation reduces the need for allogenic transfusion and involves minimal wastage. In a procedure which has significant blood loss, we suggest that preoperative autologous donation is a safe and cost effective method of managing blood loss.

The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the use of predonation of autologous blood for the periacetabular osteotomy. We carried out a retrospective single surgeon series study looking at patient demographics, intraoperative blood loss, volume of red cells returned (by cell salvage and allogenic/autologous transfusion), and comparing pre- and postoperative haemoglobin levels in those that predonated and those that did not. One hundred and twenty-two procedures were performed on 107 patients between 1996 and 2005. An initial audit (22 procedures) revealed high wastage (45% returned) of allogenic blood. A predonation protocol was initiated and subsequently 100 procedures in 91 patients were performed. In 82 procedures, the patients were eligible for predonation. A total of 226 units of autologous blood were predonated and 92% was used. Only 13 of these patients (16%) required additional allogenic transfusion for unforeseen excessive blood loss intraoperatively. A set protocol for predonation reduces the need for allogenic transfusion and involves minimal wastage. In a procedure which has significant blood loss, we suggest that preoperative autologous donation is a safe and cost effective method of managing blood loss.

No abstract