The treatment of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has involved using revision implants in association with cement, augments, particulate, and structural allograft. Newer metaphyseal augments were introduced to allow for metaphyseal fixation of the prosthesis while managing significant bone loss. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the outcome of revision TKA using metaphyseal sleeves. The authors prospectively followed 96 knees that underwent revision TKA with metaphyseal sleeves. Eighty-three knees met the minimum 2-year criteria for follow-up. Thirty-six sleeves were used in femoral revisions and 83 sleeves were used in tibial revisions. The defects were classified according to the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute classification. Femoral defects were classified as type I in 4 knees, type IIb in 25 knees, and type III in 7 knees. Tibial defects were classified as type I in 9 knees, type IIa in 1 knee, type IIb in 68 knees, and type III in 5 knees. The patients were followed for an average of 2.4 years (range, 2.0-3.7 years). Mean Knee Society function score improved from 47.9 to 61.1 points. Mean Short Form 36 physical score improved from 43.3 to 56.3 points. Mean Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index improved from 55.3 to 25.9 points. None of the implants demonstrated progressive radiolucent lines around the metaphyseal sleeves. At final follow-up, only 2 (2.7%) tibial components required revision for aseptic loosening. At short-term follow-up, revision TKA with metaphyseal sleeves provided reliable fixation. This is especially encouraging given the severe nature of bone loss in the majority of patients in whom a metaphyseal sleeve was used. Long-term follow-up is needed to demonstrate the true effectiveness of these devices.

No abstract

No abstract

Stiffness following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common complication that can result in unsatisfactory outcomes. Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) has been widely employed to treat this problem. It is uncertain whether an association exists between range of motion (ROM) at discharge and need for MUA following primary TKA.A retrospective review of an institutional joint registry identified cases of primary TKA performed by three surgeons at a single institution over a 22-month period. A logistic regression model was used to examine the association between ROM at discharge and subsequent MUA controlling for confounding variables related to patient demographics and perioperative details.Of the 1,546 cases identified, 113 (7.3%) cases underwent subsequent MUA. As discharge ROM increased, manipulation rates decreased. Patients with discharge flexion <65 degrees were more likely to undergo MUA than those with flexion >90 degrees (odds ratio [OR] = 17.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] [7.97, 38.73], p < 0.0001). The largest differential in odds of MUA was observed between the <65 degrees at discharge group (OR = 17.57) and the 65 ≤ 75 degrees at discharge group (OR = 7.89). At discharge ROM of 80 ≤ 90 degrees of flexion, patients had more than a twofold increase in odds of MUA relative to those in the >90 degrees group (OR = 2.22, 95% CI [1.20, 4.10], p = 0.011).The results of this study suggest that there is an association between lower ROM at discharge and greater risk of MUA post primary TKA. Counseling patients in regard to discharge ROM and associated risk of MUA may optimize gains in ROM during recovery.

Background: Hook of hamate fractures are relatively common in baseball players, but the proper diagnosis and surgical technique can be challenging. Outcomes after surgical excision, as well as optimal surgical technique, in elite baseball players have not been clearly established. Hypothesis: Excision of hook of hamate fractures with a technique tailored to elite professional and collegiate baseball players will lead to high rates of return to play within a short time. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: We reviewed the cases of 42 elite athletes who underwent surgical excision of 42 hook of hamate fractures at a single academic hand surgery practice from 2006 to 2020. The athletes competed at the professional (n = 20) or varsity collegiate (n = 22) baseball levels and were treated using the same surgical technique tailored toward the elite athlete. The clinical history, timing of surgery, complications, and time to return to play were recorded for each patient. Results: All 42 patients underwent an excision of their hook of hamate fracture at a mean of 7.2 weeks (range, 0.5-52 weeks) from the onset of symptoms. All but one patient were able to return to full preinjury level of baseball participation within 6 weeks from the date of surgery, with a mean return to sport of 5.4 weeks (range, 3-8 weeks). Two patients returned to the operating room—1 for scar tissue formation causing ulnar nerve compression and 1 for residual bone fragment causing pain and ulnar nerve compression. Conclusion: Surgical excision of hook of hamate fractures in elite baseball players showed a very high rate of return to play within 6 weeks. Meticulous adherence to the described surgical technique tailored to athletes optimizes clinical outcomes and avoids complications.