This simple, inexpensive, and effective injector is a safe and viable device to facilitate this part of DMEK surgery.

Purpose To evaluate the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations with A-constant optimization in Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) combined with cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation (DSAEK triple procedure). Design Retrospective case series. Participants Thirty eyes of 22 patients with Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy who underwent the DSAEK triple procedure performed by a single surgeon. Methods Prediction errors were calculated retrospectively for consecutive DSAEK triple procedures. These prediction errors then were used to determine an IOL constant for this cohort of patients. The new optimized IOL constant subsequently was compared with the manufacturer’s IOL constant, allowing evaluation and quantification of refractive benefits of optimization. Main Outcomes Measures The error in diopters (D) of the predicted refraction with the manufacturer’s and optimized IOL constants. Results Optimization of the A constant decreased the mean absolute error (MAE) from 1.09±0.63 D (range, 0.12–2.41 D) to 0.61±0.4 D (range, 0–1.58 D; P = 0.004). Comparing the intended and final postoperative refractions calculated with the original manufacturer’s constant and the optimized constant, 20% versus 43% of all eyes were in the less than 0.5-D range and 50% versus 83% of all eyes were in the less than 1.0-D range of the target refraction. Furthermore, optimization decreased the number of eyes that were more than 1.0 D from the target refraction from 50% to 17%. Conclusions Optimization of the IOL constant showed significantly improved accuracy of predicted postoperative refraction compared with the manufacturer’s IOL constant, which may help improve the postoperative refractive outcomes in patients undergoing the DSAEK triple procedure.

A variation of the femtosecond laser-assisted sutureless anterior lamellar keratoplasty technique using a femtosecond laser incision for surgical management of anterior corneal disease is described. Six patients with corneal scars were treated with the laser to create a horizontal lamellar bed interface in the cornea of the donor and recipient eyes, with a manual partial-thickness vertical trephination to complete the excisions. This technique allows matching of donor and host tissue dimensions with precise tissue apposition and greater surface area for healing. No intraoperative adverse events were observed. One patient developed epithelial ingrowth, requiring a successful surgical intervention.

Purpose: To investigate the relationship between quantitative iris parameters and the presence of keratoconus. Methods: Cross-sectional observational study that included 15 affected eyes of 15 patients with keratoconus and 26 eyes of 26 normal age-and sex-matched controls. Iris parameters (area, thickness, and pupil diameter) of affected and unaffected eyes were measured under standardized light and dark conditions using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). To identify optimal iris thickness cutoff points to maximize the sensitivity and specificity when discriminating keratoconus eyes from normal eyes, the analysis included the use of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: Iris thickness and area were lower in keratoconus eyes than in normal eyes. The mean thickness at the pupillary margin under both light and dark conditions was found to be the best parameter for discriminating normal patients from keratoconus patients. Diagnostic performance was assessed by the area under the ROC curve (AROC), which had a value of 0.8256 with 80.0% sensitivity and 84.6% specificity, using a cutoff of 0.4125 mm. The sensitivity increased to 86.7% when a cutoff of 0.4700 mm was used. Conclusions: In our sample, iris thickness was lower in keratoconus eyes than in normal eyes. These results suggest that tomographic parameters may provide novel adjunct approaches for keratoconus screening.