No abstract

No abstract

BackgroundThis study assessed women and providers' satisfaction with a new evidence-based antenatal care (ANC) model within the WHO randomized trial conducted in four developing countries. The WHO study was a randomized controlled trial that compared a new ANC model with the standard type offered in each country. The new model of ANC emphasized actions known to be effective in improving maternal or neonatal health, excluded other interventions that have not proved to be beneficial, and improved the information component, especially alerting pregnant women to potential health problems and instructing them on appropriate responses. These activities were distributed within four antenatal care visits for women that did not need any further assessment.MethodsSatisfaction was measured through a standardized questionnaire administered to a random sample of 1,600 pregnant women and another to all antenatal care providers.ResultsMost women in both arms expressed satisfaction with ANC. More women in the intervention arm were satisfied with information on labor, delivery, family planning, pregnancy complications and emergency procedures. More providers in the experimental clinics were worried about visit spacing, but more satisfied with the time spent and information provided.ConclusionsWomen and providers accepted the new ANC model generally. The safety of fewer visits for women without complications with longer spacing would have to be reinforced, if such a model is to be introduced into routine practice.

Background: The results of a qualitative study carried out in four developing countries (Cuba, Thailand, Saudi Arabia and Argentina) are presented. The study was conducted in the context of a randomised controlled trial to test the benefits of a new antenatal care protocol that reduced the number of visits to the doctor, rationalised the application of technology, and improved the provision of information to women in relation to the traditional protocol applied in each country.

In 2012, the Mexican government declared that Seguro Popular had reached the goal of providing health insurance to nearly 53 million individuals previously not enrolled with social security. This major achievement was reached in only nine years of operation of the new system. However, enormous challenges remain to guarantee that Seguro Popular will provide adequate services to the newly enrolled population. This article uses information collected by four external evaluations of Seguro Popular carried out between 2007 and 2012 to analyze how financial resources are transferred from the federal level to the states and how these resources are used to purchase services on behalf of the affiliated population. We focus on three topics: the financial transfer mechanisms, the purchasing of medicines, and the contracting of health workers. The analysis shows that the implementation of Seguro Popular has confronted major challenges due to limited institutional capacity at the federal and state levels, tension in federal-state relations, limited information systems, the influence of political interests, and the use of financial resources for unauthorized expenditures at the state level. Various legal, normative, and technical changes have been introduced during implementation of Seguro Popular to improve performance, with mixed results. Mexico's experiences with the implementation of health reform may offer important lessons for other countries seeking to expand health coverage.