Background: An important aspect of evaluating patients submitted to stereotactic biopsy of the brainstem is the trajectory used. The literature describes two principal approaches: the suboccipital transcerebellar and the transfrontal; however, no studies exist comparing these two techniques. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare diagnosis success rates and complications between the suboccipital transcerebellar and transfrontal trajectories. Methods: The study evaluated 142 patients submitted to stereotactic biopsy. The patients presented brainstem tumors in the following areas: pons (n = 31), midbrain (n = 36), medulla (n = 2), pons-medulla (n = 30), pons-midbrain (n = 33), and midbrain-pons-medulla (n = 10). On 123 patients, the transfrontal approach was used, and on 19 the suboccipital transcerebellar approach. Results: Comparing success rates between the two approaches, it was observed that in the group of patients submitted to the transfrontal approach, 95.1% (117 cases) were successful, while in those submitted to the suboccipital transcerebellar approach, 84.2% (16 cases) were successful. Despite a higher success rate among patients in the first group, the difference was not statistically significant. Regarding complications, in patients who were biopsied via the transfrontal trajectory, the morbidity rate was 9.8% (12 cases), while in patients submitted to the suboccipital transcerebellar approach, the morbidity rate was 5.3% (1 case) and the mortality rate 5.3% (1 case). Conclusions: This study verified a higher diagnosis rate in patients submitted to the transfrontal approach than in those submitted to the suboccipital transcerebellar approach (95.1 vs. 84.2%); however, the difference was not statistically significant. Regarding complications, the rate was similar in both groups of patients.

The efficacy and safety of STN-DBS in our center's large cohort of Parkinsonian patients are generally similar to the results obtained by other groups, albeit at the lower limit of the range of reported values. In contrast to efficacy, the occurrence of adverse events cannot be predicted. Younger patients with Parkinson's disease (i.e., those younger than 60 yr) often show an excellent response to levodopa. However, in view of our data on overall patient satisfaction and the occurrence of adverse events, we suggest that older patients (but not those older than 70 yr) and less dopa-sensitive patients (but not those with a response <50%) should still be offered the option of STN-DBS.

Management of brainstem mass lesions remains a controversial issue, especially when the lesion cannot be excised and when infiltration occurs; moreover, the benefits of a stereotactic procedure are still under debate. In most studies, treatment decisions are based solely on MRI features and do not include a histopathological diagnosis. In the current study, we compared MRI characteristics with histopathological findings of intrinsic brainstem lesions and identified the characteristics associated with the diagnosis of pathologies other than diffuse glioma. From February 1988 through August 2007, 96 brainstem biopsies were performed at the Roger Salengro Hospital in Lille, France, on adult patients with intrinsic brainstem lesions not amenable to excision. Of the 96 patients, 42 were women and 54 were men, with a mean age of 41 years (range, 18-75 years). Data analysis of the MRI findings revealed focal (P < .05) and contrast enhancing lesions (P < .05), and these lesions were significant factors associated with the diagnosis of pathologies other than diffuse glioma. Focal lesions were a significant factor associated with a diagnosis of nontumor lesions (P < .05). In conclusion, the diagnostic effect of stereotactic biopsy on intrinsic brainstem lesions was greater in patients with focal or enhancing lesions shown by MRI, in whom the diagnosis of diffuse glioma was less frequent.

Objective: Motor cortex stimulation (MCS) is considered to be an effective treatment for chronic neuropathic pain. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of MCS for treating neuropathic pain. Method: 27 patients with chronic neuropathic pain were operated. Electrodes were implanted with the use of an stereotactic frame. Electrophysiological evaluations (motor stimulation and somatosensory evoked potentials) were performed, with guidance by means of three-dimensional reconstruction of magnetic resonance images of the brain. 10 patients (37%) presented central neuropathic pain (poststroke pain) and 17 others (63%) presented peripheral neuropathic pain (brachial plexus avulsion, phantom limb pain or trigeminal pain). Results: In 15 patients (57.7%) the pain relief was 50% or more; while in ten patients (38.5%), more than 60% of the original pain was relieved. No differences were found in relation to central and peripheral neuropathic pain (p=0.90), pain location (p=0.81), presence of motor deficit (p=0.28) and pain duration (p=0.72). No major complications were observed. Conclusion: MCS was efficient for treating patients presenting chronic central or peripheral neuropathic pain. Key words: electric motor cortex stimulation, neuropathic pain, central pain, peripheral pain, treatment.Estimulação elétrica do córtex motor no tratamento da dor neuropática RESUMO Objetivo: A estimulação do córtex motor (ECM) é método considerado eficaz no tratamento da dor neuropática crônica rebelde. O presente estudo avaliou a eficácia da ECM no tratamento de pacientes portadores de dor neuropática crônica. Método: 27 doentes foram avaliados; 10 (37,0%) apresentavam dor neuropática de origem central, enquanto 17 (63,0%), dor neuropática periférica. Avulsão de raízes do plexo braquial, dor no membro fantasma, dor decorrente de doença cerebrovascular isquêmica ou hemorrágica ou neuropatia trigeminal foram as causas mais freqüentes da dor. Os doentes foram operados com uso da técnica de localização estereotáctica do córtex motor associadamente a estudo eletroneurofisiológico (estimulação motora e potencial evocado somatossensitivo) ou ainda com uso de imagens de ressonância magnética do encéfalo reconstruídas tridimensionalmente. Resultados: O alívio da dor foi igual ou superior a 50% em 15 doentes (57,7%), sendo em 10 (38,5%), superior a 60%. Não houve diferença nos resultados quanto a origem central ou periférica (p=0,90) da dor, localização da dor (p=0,81), ocorrência ou não de déficit motor (p=0,28) e duração da sintomatologia (p=0,72). Não foram observadas complicações graves. Conclusão: A estimulação do córtex motor foi útil no tratamento da dor neuropática crônica rebelde tanto de origem central como periférica. Palavras-chave: estimulação elétrica do córtex motor, dor neuropática, dor central, dor periférica, tratamento. CorrespondenceWalter J. Fagundes-Pereyra

Radiosurgery is a safe and effective treatment for AVMs in the pediatric age group. One criterion for success was the use of a prescription dose similar to that used with adult populations.