The inherent unlimited high switching frequency of the sliding mode controller (SMC) is limited by practical constraints of the hysteresis modulation (HM) technique. The inductor current and output voltage of a converter can be regulated using a combination of HM-SMC. However, HM-SMC results in a variable switching frequency operation, which is not preferred due to Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) issues. In this paper, an interval fuzzy controller is designed and developed as a solution to enable HM-SMC. In addition, a robust sliding surface is proposed, which provides an improved dynamic response. The two proposed controllers’ compatibility with one another has been tested via experiments such as a step change in input voltage, load resistance variation, and finally, a step change in output voltage reference value. The test results validate that while the interval type-2 fuzzy maintains a constant switching frequency with acceptable dynamic responses, it successfully regulates the state variables of the system. A comparison of the performance of the proposed control method with existing techniques in the literature is presented.

In this paper, a modified fast terminal sliding mode control (FTSMC) with a fixed switching frequency is proposed for regulating the output voltage of the DC-DC buck converters. The design steps of the proposed FTSMC such as the selection of sliding surface, switching control strategy, existence, robustness, and stability analysis are presented in detail. To overcome the variable switching frequency in FTSMC, a frequency control loop is designed. Moreover, the proposed FTSMC with fixed switching frequency can be implemented by using only one voltage sensor. Hence, the proposed control method not only offers a fast dynamic response and fixed switching frequency but also simplifies the controller design in practical implementation. The effectiveness of the proposed control methods has been investigated by experimental studies. The results reveal that the proposed methods exhibit a good performance under both steady-state and dynamic transients caused by the variations in load resistance, input voltage, and reference voltage. Moreover, the proposed method is compared with four existing methods.

No abstract

No abstract