Objective: To develop a consensus on the diagnostic criteria for chronic endometritis (CE) at hysteroscopy (HSC), and to evaluate these proposed criteria in a randomized-controlled observer study. Design: Systematic review of studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of HSC in CE diagnosis; Delphi consensus on hysteroscopic diagnostic criteria for CE; randomized-controlled observer study to evaluate the reproducibility of the proposed diagnostic criteria. Setting: Not applicable. Participant(s): Experts from different countries were involved in the systematic review and contributed to the Delphi consensus. Physicians from different countries were involved in the observer study. Intervention(s): After reaching consensus on the diagnostic criteria, the Delphi poll created a questionnaire including 100 hysteroscopic pictures (50 from women with CE [domain 1] and 50 from women without CE [domain 2]), with a single question per picture (Answer_A: suggestive of CE; answer B: not suggestive of CE). A total of 200 physicians were invited to take part in the observer study. Before completing the questionnaire, physicians were randomized to receive a description of the diagnostic criteria (group A) or no such information (group B). Main Outcome Measure(s): The primary outcome was to compare the questionnaire scores for the two groups of observers. The secondary outcome was to assess the interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of CE in each group. Result(s): A total of 126 physicians completed the questionnaire (62 in group A and 64 in group B). Observers in group A obtained higher total scores compared with those in group B (P< .001). Specifically, group A showed higher mean score in domain 1 (P< .001), but not in domain 2 (P¼ .975). A substantial agreement was found among observers in group A (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.78), whereas a fair agreement was found among observers in group B (ICC 0.40). Conclusion(s):This randomized-controlled observer study found a positive impact of our criteria on physicians' ability to recognize CE. (Fertil Steril Ò 2019;112:162-73. Ó2019 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.) El resumen está disponible en Español al final del artículo.

No abstract

Objective: To investigate whether isolated oligohydramnios at term is associated with increased rates of perinatal morbidity and mortality and whether induction of labor in term pregnancies with isolated oligohydramnios is superior to conservative management in reducing perinatal morbidity and mortality. Study Design: We searched databases from inception to May 2015. We included studies that evaluated isolated oligohydramnios at term and perinatal outcome. Each outcome was analyzed separately, performing a comparative analysis between the study and control groups. Results: Twelve studies were included with 35,999 women: 2,414 (6.7%) with isolated oligohydramnios and 33,585 (93.29%) with normal amniotic fluid index. Patients with isolated oligohydramnios had significantly higher rates of labor induction [odds ratio (OR) 7.56, confidence interval (CI) 4.58-12.48] and Cesarean sections (OR 2.07, CI 1.77-2.41). There were higher rates of an Apgar score <7 at 1 and 5 min (OR 1.53, CI 1.03-2.26, and OR 2.01, CI 1.3-3.09, respectively) and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (OR 1.47, CI 1.17-1.84). There were no significant differences in cord pH <7.1 and meconium-stained amniotic fluid. In the single randomized trial comparing induction of labor with expectant management, no differences were found in any significant maternal or neonatal outcomes. Conclusion: Isolated oligohydramnios at term is associated with significantly higher rates of labor induction, Cesarean sections, and short-term neonatal morbidity.

Background Whether placental location confers specific neonatal risks is controversial. In particular, whether placenta previa is associated with intra-uterine growth restriction (IUGR)/small for gestational age (SGA) remains a matter of debate. Methods We searched Medline, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Scopus, ISI Web of Science and Cochrane database search, as well as PubMed (www.pubmed.gov) until the end of December 2018 to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the risk of IUGR/SGA in cases of placenta previa. We defined IUGR/SGA as birth weight below the 10th percentile, regardless of the terminology used in individual studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We used odds ratios (OR) and a fixed effects (FE) model to calculate weighted estimates in a forest plot. Statistical homogeneity was checked with the I2 statistic using Review Manager 5.3.5 (The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014). Results We obtained 357 records, of which 13 met the inclusion criteria. All study designs were retrospective in nature, and included 11 cohort and two case-control studies. A total of 1,593,226 singleton pregnancies were included, of which 10,575 had a placenta previa. The incidence of growth abnormalities was 8.7/100 births in cases of placenta previa vs. 5.8/100 births among controls. Relative to cases with alternative placental location, pregnancies with placenta previa were associated with a mild increase in the risk of IUGR/SGA, with a pooled OR [95% confidence interval (CI)] of 1.19 (1.10–1.27). Statistical heterogeneity was high with an I2 = 94%. Conclusion Neonates from pregnancies with placenta previa have a mild increase in the risk of IUGR/SGA.

To evaluate the prevalence of chronic endometritis (CE) among fertile and infertile women who underwent hysteroscopic polypectomy. Design: A retrospective cohort study. Setting: University-affiliated tertiary hospital. Patients: A total of 277 women who underwent hysteroscopic polypectomy in the period from 2015 to 2018. Interventions: Endometrial polyp samples were obtained after hysteroscopy for histopathologic analysis using hematoxylin-eosin and immunohistochemistry staining with CD138 antibodies for plasma cell detection. All infertile women diagnosed with CE were treated with oral doxycycline 100 mg twice daily for 14 days before infertility treatment. Measurements and Main Results: The prevalence of CE in infertile women (n = 137) was significantly higher than in those with no history of infertility (n = 140) (22.6% vs 8.6%; p = .001). The prevalence of CE between women with primary infertility and those with secondary infertility was similar (25.0% vs 19.3%; p = .43). Clinical pregnancy (32.3% vs 41.5%; p = .35), live birth (29.0% vs 38.7%; p = .33), and miscarriage (10.0% vs 6.8%; p = .73) rates were similar between infertile women with treated CE and those without CE. A multivariate model showed that diagnosis of infertility was significantly associated with the diagnosis of CE (odds ratio, 3.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.53−6.49). Conclusion:In women with endometrial polyps, the prevalence of CE in infertile women is higher than that in fertile women. Pregnancy outcome in infertile women with treated CE was similar to those who were infertile and without CE.