The efficacy of convalescent plasma for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is unclear. Although most randomized controlled trials have shown negative results, uncontrolled studies have suggested that the antibody content could influence patient outcomes. We conducted an open-label, randomized controlled trial of convalescent plasma for adults with COVID-19 receiving oxygen within 12 d of respiratory symptom onset (NCT04348656). Patients were allocated 2:1 to 500 ml of convalescent plasma or standard of care. The composite primary outcome was intubation or death by 30 d. Exploratory analyses of the effect of convalescent plasma antibodies on the primary outcome was assessed by logistic regression. The trial was terminated at 78% of planned enrollment after meeting stopping criteria for futility. In total, 940 patients were randomized, and 921 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Intubation or death occurred in 199/614 (32.4%) patients in the convalescent plasma arm and 86/307 (28.0%) patients in the standard of care arm—relative risk (RR) = 1.16 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94–1.43, P = 0.18). Patients in the convalescent plasma arm had more serious adverse events (33.4% versus 26.4%; RR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.02–1.57, P = 0.034). The antibody content significantly modulated the therapeutic effect of convalescent plasma. In multivariate analysis, each standardized log increase in neutralization or antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity independently reduced the potential harmful effect of plasma (odds ratio (OR) = 0.74, 95% CI 0.57–0.95 and OR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.50–0.87, respectively), whereas IgG against the full transmembrane spike protein increased it (OR = 1.53, 95% CI 1.14–2.05). Convalescent plasma did not reduce the risk of intubation or death at 30 d in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Transfusion of convalescent plasma with unfavorable antibody profiles could be associated with worse clinical outcomes compared to standard care.

No abstract

A 7-week treatment with the tobacco carcinogen NNK induced 8-10 lung adenomas per A/J mouse. NNK suppressed humoral and cellular immune responses and increased plasma PGE2 and LTB4 levels. This protocol is particularly suitable for testing NSAIDs and lipoxygenase inhibitors as cancer preventive agents. Sulindac and ASA inhibited lung tumorigenesis by 52 and 60%, respectively, attenuated the suppressive effect of NNK, and lowered the plasma PGE2 to basal levels. In contrast, naproxen neither inhibited lung tumorigenesis nor increased NNK-suppressed NK cell cytotoxicity. NSAIDs and lipoxygenase inhibitors had additive preventive efficacies against NNK-induced lung tumorigenesis. However, sulindac was not effective in preventing lung tumorigenesis induced by B[a]P, which lacks immunosuppressive activity. These results and those published by other investigators lead to the following hypothesis: Reactive intermediates derived from NNK interfere with the stimulation of the complex NF-kappa B/I kappa B. NF-kappa B is involved in the regulation of immune and inflammatory responses. The authors propose that NNK-derived intermediates induce the expression of COX-2 and lipoxygenase involved in NNK activation. This hypothesis provides a rationale for the lack of efficacy of naproxen to prevent tumorigenesis, to attenuate NNK-induced synthesis of PGE2, and to increase NK cell cytotoxicity. According to this hypothesis, PGE2 synthesis and induction of apoptosis contribute to varying degrees to the mechanism of cancer prevention.

Ellagic acid (EA), derived from fruit ellagitannins, is known to be antimutagenic and anticarcinogenic in various animal tumor models. In this study, EA at a dose of 4 g/kg diet inhibited multiplicity of tumors induced by 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) in A/J mice by 54%. This inhibition was dose related between 0.06 and 4.0 g/kg diet. In contrast, two related compounds, esculin and esculetin, had no effect on lung tumorigenesis. The biodistribution of EA was studied as a function of dose and time after gavage of EA. The levels of EA in the lung were directly proportional to the dose of EA between 0.2 and 2.0 mmol. The maximum level of EA, corresponding to 21.3 nmol/g, was observed 30 minutes after gavage with 2.0 mmol of EA/kg body wt, which corresponds to only 70 ppm of the administered dose. The levels in liver tissues were 10-fold lower and reached a maximum 30 minutes after gavage. At this interval, the blood level of EA was 1 nmol/ml. The inclusion of EA in cyclodextrin doubles the level of EA in lung tissues. These results demonstrate that EA localizes preferentially in lung tissues and confirm that EA administered orally can inhibit lung tumorigenesis.

No abstract