I In nt tr ro od du uc ct ti io on nAcute myocardial infarction (MI) is frequently associated with left ventricular (LV) remodeling leading to progressive heart failure (HF). LV remodeling after acute MI is an impor- DOI: 10.4250/jcu.2010.18.3.77 E Ev va al lu ua at ti io on n o of f C Ca ar rd di ia ac c F Fu un nc ct ti io on n b by y T Tr ra an ns st th ho or ra ac ci ic c E Ec ch ho oc ca ar rd di io og gr ra ap ph hy y i in n S Su ub bj je ec ct ts s w wi it th h S ST T--S Se eg gm me en nt t E El le ev va at ti io on n M My yo oc ca ar rd di ia al l I
O OR RI IG GI IN NA AL L A AR RT TI IC CL LE EIn nf fa ar rc ct ti io on n F Fo ol ll lo ow wi in ng g P Pr ri im ma ar ry y P Pe er rc cu ut ta an ne eo ou us s C Co or ro on na ar ry y I In nt te er rv ve en nt ti io on n a ac cc co or rd di in ng g t to o V Va al ls sa ar rt ta an n D Do os se e: : T Th he e V Va al ls sa ar rt ta an n O On ne e C Ce en nt te er r T Tr ri ia al l The mean follow-up TTE duration was 24 ± 8 months. Deceleration time (188.6 ± 56.3 msec vs. 221.5 ± 71.3 msec, p = 0.01), E/e' (12.24 ± 5.2 vs. 10.1 ± 4.9, p = 0.002), ejection fraction (52.7 ± 8% vs. 55.2 ± 8.4%, p < 0.01), and wall motion score index (1.45 ± 0.30 vs. 1.33 ± 0.32, p < 0.01) showed significant changes during the follow-up period. Wall motion improvement in injured myocardial segments was more frequently observed in the high-dose valsartan group compared to the low-dose group [18/25 (72%) vs. 24/53 (43.7%), p = 0.03]. There was no significant difference in the changes in cardiac dimensions and function between the low and high dose valsartan group. C Co on nc cl lu us si io on n: : In patients with STEMI who undergoing primary PCI, high-dose valsartan treatment may be more helpful than low-dose in improving wall motion in the injured myocardium.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.