Objective: To know about the current state of knowledge in diagnostic radiation safety which is uppermost in mind of all the dental clinicians. Methods: A total of 301 references were reviewed using standard search engines Pubmed and Google. Twenty-two, were selected as relevant by all the authors, for our area of inquiry. The temporal status of these studies were from 2008 to 2017. Two categories of research was identified, those with anthropometric phantoms and those with real patients. Results: Initially we divided them into Phantom based studies (17) 77.27% and the patient-based studies were (5) 22.73%. There is paucity of actual patient studies due to noncooperation by patients for radiation-based study and also because of severe restriction by ethical committee to give permission for such study. Conclusion: The extensive Phantom based studies and specific patient studies of radiation measurement in diagnostic dental domain has suggested to a large extent that this is a safe mode of tool of treatment selection. The risks are very minimal and unnecessary radiography must be avoided and each radiographic session must be customized.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.