No abstract

Background: Hyperactivation of the PI3K/AKT pathway correlates with impaired anti-tumor responses, including reduced T cell infiltration into tumor, and reduced efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Blockade of this pathway synergizes with PD-L1/PD-1 axis blockade preclinically. Methods: This Phase I clinical trial (NCT03673787) assessed the safety, pharmacodynamic, and preliminary clinical activity of Ipa (200mg or 400mg OD) given in combination with A 1200mg q3 wk in refractory pts. Serial paired blood and tumor samples were analysed to interrogate the effect of Ipa on the tumor micro-environment and host immune system prior to the addition of the immune check point inhibitor, A. Results: 18 adult pts were treated in dose escalation. Median age 49 yrs. All pts had ECOG PS 0-1 and median 7 prior therapies. Most common TRAEs (>15%) were mild Gr1-2 diarrhea (56%), rash (50%), fatigue (33%), nausea (33%), raised ALT/AST (33%), headache (28%) and arthralgia (22%). 1 pt had G2 systemic immune activation; 2 pts had G3 rash, both rapidly reversible. 1 DLT of G3 raised ALT seen at 200mg (1 DLT/9 evaluable pts) but none at 400mg (0 DLT/6). Of 14 RECIST evaluable patients, there were 2 confirmed PRs, and 5 SD (clinical benefit rate 50%). Reductions of CD4+FOXP3+ Tregs in tumor microenvironment were seen after 2wks of single agent Ipa, regardless of PIK3/AKT somatic mutation status (Table 1). Responding pts had a >400% median increase in intra-tumoral CD8+ Teff cell infiltration, effectively switching from a desert phenotype to an inflamed phenotype. Paired changes in FACS, transcriptome and cytokine will also be presented.Conclusions: The RP2D of Ipa 400mg OD combination with A was well tolerated with early efficacy signals. Further biomarker work is ongoing and will be evaluated in expansion cohorts. Table 1:Changes in immune cell populations as assessed by multicolour Immunofluorescence in paired biopsies of breast/gynae patients, % change in cell number/mm2 from baseline (median [min,max$])&Post 2 weeks single agent Ipatasertib(n=9)Post 1 cycle of combination Ipatasertib and Atezolizumab(n=7)CD4+FOXP3+Tregs cellsCD 8+ Teff cellsCD4+FOXP3+Tregs cellsCD 8+ Teff cellsIntra-tumourstromaIntra-tumourstromaIntra-tumourstromaIntra-tumourstromaAll patients-23.9*[-89.7, BL0]-30.0*[-91.6, BL0]-37.7*[-84.4, -24.5]-28.4[-92.4, 259.8]335.9[-44.0,BL0]45.4[-51.0, BL0]59.6[-60.6,493.3]64.7[-51.7,293.3]Stratified by somatic PI3K/AKT/PTEN mutational statusPathogenic mutations (mt)11.1[-82.2, BL0]#-10.7[-91.6, BL0]Φnsnsnsns-30.5[-60.6,-0.5]11.3[-51.7,50.0]Wildtype (wt)-63.1[-89.7,19.0]#-47.5[-77.0,11.1]Φnsnsnsns426.5[59.6,493.3]126.7[79.4,293.3]Stratified by responseResponders (PR + SD>4 cycles). 1 ER+ HER2+ breast cancer (wt), 1 ER+ HER2- breast cancer (wt)459.9[426.5,493.3]@103.1[79.4,126.7]Non-responders (PD at 4 cycles) 1 cervical cancer, 4 ER+ breast cancer-0.5[-60.6, 59.6]@30.6[-51.7,293.3]*significant change (p≤0.05; Wilcoxon sign-rank test) from baseline, $maximum values denoted by BL0indicate that the baseline value was zero, and so percentage change from baseline is not defined. For the analysis, the baseline value has been replaced by a nominal value of 0.1 so that a large percentage increase is associated with these cases. Note that these large percentage increases do not affect the non-parametric statistical tests used.#no significant difference in distribution of reduction in intra-tumoural CD4+ FOXP3+Tregsbetween pts with pathogenic mutations in PI3K/AKT and those without (p=0.30; Wilcoxon rank-sum test)Φno significant difference in distribution of reduction in stromal CD4+FOXP3+Tregsbetween pts with pathogenic mutations in PI3K/AKT and those without (p=0.44; Wilcoxon rank-sum test) @ difference between responders and non-responders p=0.083; Wilcoxon rank-sum test)mt pathogenic mutations in PI3K/AKT and PTEN as per COSMIC database present in tumour or PTEN loss by IHC. wt no pathogenic mutations in PI3K/AKT and PTEN as per COSMIC database detected in tumour and intact PTEN expression by IHC. &exploratory analyses with no adjustment for multiple testing Citation Format: Juanita S. Lopez, Andrea Biondo, Crescens Tiu, Mariana Scaranti, Malaka Ameratunga, Anna Zachariou, Alison Turner, Nina Tunariu, Toby Prout, Mona Parmar, Hannah Badham, Karen Swales, Wei Yuan, Ricardo Morilla, Mateus Crespo, Rob Daly, Ines Figueiredo, Bora Gurel, Rita Pereira, Ruth Riisnaes, Igor Vivanco, Anna Minchom, Ben Jenkins, Christina Yap, Udai Banerji, Johann De Bono. Proof-of-concept evidence of immune modulation by blockade of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-AKT signaling pathway in the phase I dose escalation study of Ipatasertib (Ipa) in combination with atezolizumab (A) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors (Ice-CAP) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT140.

Introduction The epidemiology of hepatitis B and C in Europe is changing, with migration causing significant increases in prevalence rates. Northern Ireland still has a very low prevalence of viral hepatitis, with an average of 80-100 HBV and 100-120 HCV cases being diagnosed every year. Certain groups however are at higher risk of infection including those born in high or intermediate endemic areas. Aim The aim was to set up a single viral hepatitis community screening event to offer testing to members of the Chinese community in Belfast and determine the prevalence of HBV and HCV in those tested. Methods Members of the Belfast Chinese Community were invited to attend a Hepatitis BandC awareness and testing session held in the Chinese Welfare Centre. All those attending for testing were educated regarding the advantages and disadvantages of screening through a presentation (translated) and literature. Dry blood spot (DBS) testing was used as an alternative to venous sampling to try and encourage participation. All patients (and their GPs) were informed of results by letter. Those with positive HBsAg or positive HCV antibody individuals were contacted by letter and also by telephone with the assistance of an interpreter and asked to attend a hospital clinic. Those who tested HBsAg negative and HBcAb positive were advised to attend their GP surgery for follow up HBV serology and HBV DNA. HIV testing was offered to all those with a positive result. Results 97 individuals expressed an interest in coming forward testing but 29 (30%) could not be screened as they were not registered with a GP in Northern Ireland. Of those that attended the event 55 individuals were tested (62% female, mean age 47, range 22 -67). 13 (24%) individuals tested.HBsAg negative and HBcAb positive, -suggesting previous infection. Five patients (9%) individuals tested positive for chronic viral hepatitis -4 were HBsAg positive and 1 was HCV PCR positive. All 5 subsequently attended a hepatology clinic for follow-up.49 (89%) of those presenting for testing reported they had never been vaccinated against HBV. Conclusion DBS testing of a sample of the Chinese community living in a low prevalence area of the UK can detect chronic viral hepatitis in 9%. In addition, one third of those requesting screening were not registered with a GP and therefore could not be detected by current NHS services. This suggests that the NHS need to consider setting up screening services for ethnic communities even in low prevalence areas of the UK.Project Funding: Funding for the dried blood spot testing kits and the analysis of these were paid for by Roche Pharmaceuticals. REFERENCES

Background: Low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) constitutes up to 10% of all ovarian cancer and has clinical and molecular characteristics (resistance to chemotherapy, presence of RAS/RAF mutations, lack of TP53 mutations) distinct from high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Here, we characterized the effects of the dual RAF/MEK inhibitor VS-6766 and the FAK inhibitor defactinib on signal transduction and viability in LGSOC cell lines and patient-derived organoids. To correlate molecular characteristics with clinical response, we characterized genomic alterations in archival tumor samples from patients with LGSOC treated with the combination of VS-6766 and defactinib on a clinical trial (FRAME). Material and Methods: We exposed 5 LGSOC cell lines to clinical Cmax concentrations adjusted for protein binding of VS-6766 and defactinib. We quantified phospho- and total proteins (n=66) with an antibody-bead based assay normalized to GAPDH. We also studied growth inhibitory effects of the combination on KRAS mutant (mt) LGSOC patient-derived organoids. We performed next generation sequencing on archival samples from LGSOC patients treated with VS-6766 in combination with defactinib. Results: Signal transduction changes at 1 hr included reduction of p-FAK in 5/5 cell lines in response to defactinib. Cells exposed to VS-6766 showed a reduction in p-ERK and p-p90-RSK in 4/5 cell lines. Additionally, VS-6766 decreased p-cJUN and increased p-IκB in 4/5 cell lines, changes correlated with apoptosis. At 24 hrs, p-ERK and p-p90-RSK inhibition were maintained in 3/5 cell lines. Both drugs increased cleaved PARP in 4/5 cell lines and VS-6766 increased p-SMAD3 and BIM levels, indicating an increase in cell death/apoptosis. The combination of VS-6766 + defactinib showed synergistic growth inhibition in a KRAS mt LGSOC organoid model (combination index 0.51). The clinical combination of VS-6766 and defactinib (September 2021 cut-off) has shown an objective response rate (ORR) of 11/24 (46%) across all patients with LGSOC, and an ORR of 64% (7/11) for patients with KRAS mt LGSOC (n=11). In addition to mutations in KRAS, emerging data may suggest a correlation of U2AF1 and MED12 mutations with response. Conclusions: VS-6766, the dual RAF/MEK inhibitor, induces significant inhibition of ERK pathway signaling in addition to perturbations in TNF/NFκB signaling. Both defactinib and VS-6766 induce apoptosis in LGSOC models. The results provide mechanistic insights into the encouraging response rates observed in patients with LGSOC treated with VS-6766 and defactinib (NCT03875820). These data support the ongoing randomized phase II ENGOTov60/GOG3052/RAMP201 study (NCT04625270). Citation Format: Adam R. Stewart, Lisa Pickard, Ekta Paranjape, Victoria Sanchez Perez, Sanjib Chowdhury, Stephanie Lustgarten, Silvia Coma, Jonathan A. Pachter, Mark S. Carey, Gabriel DiMattia, Hannah C. Badham, Toby Prout, Mona Parmar, Muneeb Mahmud, Christina Yap, Matthew G. Krebs, Susana Banerjee, Udai Banerji. Mechanistic evaluation of VS-6766 (dual RAF/MEK inhibitor) and defactinib (FAK inhibitor) in low-grade serous ovarian cancer models with correlations to clinical response [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 3476.

Background University Hospitals Bristol (UHBristol) have standards for safe and professional prescribing [1]. The standards include prescriber accountability and informed clinical decision making by awareness of drug chart(s) in use and any medicine(s) not given. In 2011 the Medical, Pharmaceutical and Nursing Colleges produced standards for hospital in-patient prescription charts aimed to help eliminate prescribing errors and improve patient outcomes [2]. The standards correlate with the UHBristol standards. Timeline Initial audit February 2010. New prescription chart was released in July 2010 and re-audited in September 2010. Revised chart was released July 2011 and re-audited in January 2012. Directing Change The audit results and the NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) [3] tool informed each chart change. The strategy was co-ordinated by pharmacy, with input from the healthcare team. Purpose To establish achievement of the prescribing standards below within in-patient medical wards at UHBristol. Prescriber identity: 100% of prescribers should print their namePrescriber contact: 100% of prescribers should print their bleep numberAdditional chart(s): 100% of additional prescription charts(s) will be documented on main prescription chartMissed doses: 100% of medicines that are not given will have a documented reason Materials and MethodsData collection proforma was designed, piloted and used for each audit cycle. Ten in-patient prescription charts from each ward were reviewed. ResultsThe table states the achievement of the standards with each cycle. The last column indicates the change between the first and last audit. Conclusions Each revision of the prescription chart produced improvements in achievement of the standards. The audit cycle, PDSA and multidisciplinary approach informed changes and enhanced the charts’ fitness for purpose. References UHBristol Medicines Governance Group.Medicines code.2009. Abstract GRP-084 Table 1 Initial audit February 2010 Re-audit September 2010 Re-audit January 2012 Prescriptions reviewed 384 387 387 Change Standard Target Prescriber identity 100% 18.4% 95.2% 98% +76.6% Prescriber contact 100% 7.8% 77.9% 84% +76.2% Additional chart(s) 100% 38.3% 81.3% 90% +51.7% Missed doses 100% 5.9% 80.2% 100% +94.1% No conflict of interest.