The centrally induced effects of angiotensin II and substance P on the cardiovascular system and on neuronal efferent activity of the splanchnic, renal, and adrenal nerves were investigated in chronically instrumented conscious rats. The pressor responses to substance P injected into the lateral brain ventricle were accompanied by marked and short latency increases in heart rate, cardiac output, splanchnic, renal, and adrenal nerve activity, and a rise in plasma noradrenaline and adrenaline. Behaviorally, an arousal-type reaction was observed. In contrast, the pressor responses to intracerebroventricular angiotensin II were associated with initial decreases in heart rate, cardiac output, splanchnic, renal, and adrenal nerve activity, and a fall in plasma noradrenaline at the time of the maximal blood pressure increase. In some but not all animals, a second blood pressure peak associated with increases in heart rate and splanchnic nerve activity was observed after several minutes. Incomplete chronic sinoaortic baroreceptor deafferentiation prevented the angiotensin II-induced fall in heart rate but not the initial fall in splanchnic nerve activity. The decreases in splanchnic nerve activity also occurred in diabetes insipidus rats and persisted in Long Evans rats after vascular vasopressin receptor blockade with d(CH2)5AVP, despite marked reductions of the pressor responses in both groups. Peripheral alpha-adrenoceptor blockade with prazosin or ganglion blockade with hexamethonium inhibited the central angiotensin II pressor responses only in combination with vasopressin receptor blockade. On the other hand, either sympatholytic drug, alone, abolished the pressor responses in the diabetes insipidus rats. This indicates that in intact conscious rats the central pressor effects of angiotensin II are initiated by vasopressin release but become dependent on the sympathetic nervous system when vasopressin is absent or not effective. When rats were allowed to drink in response to angiotensin II, a further sharp rise in blood pressure occurred, together with increases in heart rate and splanchnic nerve activity. The results demonstrate fundamental differences in the mechanisms by which central pressor peptides can influence cardiovascular and autonomic function. It is conceivable that the distinct sympathetic response patterns to central angiotensin II and substance P receptor stimulation form part of a specific cardiovascular adjustment to the individual behavioral reactions, such as drinking, as in the case of angiotensin II, or arousal within the central processing of pain, as in the case of substance P.

The antihypertensive action of central GABA-ergic stimulation was investigated in conscious stroke prone spontaneously hypertensive rats. Injection of the potent GABA agonist muscimol (0.01-1 microgram) into the lateral brain ventricle (icv) lowered mean arterial blood pressure (192.1 +/- 8.4 mm Hg) dose-dependently in stroke prone spontaneously hypertensive rats with a maximal fall of -52.7 +/- 5 mm Hg lasting for about 90 minutes. This was accompanied by bradycardia and sedation. Pretreatment with atropine (2 mg/kg, ip, or 15 micrograms/kg, icv) did not significantly influence the muscimol-induced fall in mean arterial pressure. In normotensive (109.3 +/- 1.9 mm Hg) Wistar-Kyoto controls, the maximal decrease in mean arterial pressure was -12.1 +/- 1.6 mm Hg from 109.3 +/- 1.9 mm Hg, and the duration of the effect was much less than in stroke prone spontaneously hypertensive rats, Following 1 microgram muscimol, icv, plasma noradrenaline did not fall significantly in stroke prone spontaneously hypertensive and Wistar-Kyoto rats, but in stroke prone spontaneously hypertensive rats, plasma adrenaline was fully suppressed (from 118.1 +/- 24.2 to 22.8 +/- 5.7 pg/ml) throughout the depressor response. The efferent sympathetic nervous activity as directly recorded from the n. splanchnicus was similar in conscious stroke prone spontaneously hypertensive and Wistar-Kyoto rats, and was moderately reduced in both strains by 1 microgram muscimol, icv.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

No abstract

SUMMARY To test the hypothesis that the hypotensive action of urapidil is in part related to a direct action on the brain, the central (intracerebroventricular) and peripheral (intravenous) effects of urapidil were studied and compared with those obtained with clonidine and prazosin. All studies were conducted in conscious, chronically instrumented stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRSP). Efferent sympathetic nervous system activity was estimated by means of a Dipolar electrode implanted on the splanchnic nerve. Only clonidine, administered intracerebroventricularly and intravenously, decreased sympathetic nerve activity. Urapidil and prazosin either did not affect sympathetic nerve activity after central administration or increased it after peripheral administration at low and high doses, respectively. Centrally administered urapidil and prazosin lowered blood pressure but also blocked the response to intravenously administered phenylephrine; this result suggests a peripheral effect. Centrally administered urapidil decreased heart rate. Urapidil given either intracerebroventricularly or into the cisterna magna had no influence on baroreceptor responses. Intravenous infusions of urapidil and prazosin in sufficient doses to lower blood pressure in spontaneously hypertensive rats by 50 mm Hg completely blocked the actions of phenylephrine. These data suggest that in conscious SHRSP urapidil lowers blood pressure through peripheral blockade of a^-adrenergic receptors rather than by means of central sympathetic suppression. In this regard urapidil resembles prazosin rather than clonidine; however, the effect of urapidil on heart rate is consistent with a central mode of action. (Hypertension 8: 303-311, 1986 4 without a compensatory increase in heart rate (HR).3 ' 6 Urapidil's postjunctional a,-adrenergic receptor blocking activity resembles that of prazosin.7 '

This study analyzed the effects of the neuropeptides, neurotensin, and human and porcine analogue, neuropeptide Y, in anesthetized open-chest dogs. The left anterior descending coronary artery was cannulated and perfused at constant pressure via a blood reservoir. Flow to the coronary cannula was measured by an electromagnetic flowmeter, and regional segment lengths were measured by sonomicrometer crystals. Neurotensin injected into the coronary cannula resulted in a dose-dependent increase of coronary flow; neuropeptide Y resulted in a decrease of coronary flow. Because these changes in flow were not explained by systemic hemodynamic effects or alterations in regional myocardial function, they were considered to be coronary dilatation or constriction. Coronary dilatation by neurotensin was not prevented by alpha- or beta-adrenoceptor blockade but was completely abolished by indomethacin or by lowering coronary perfusion pressure to 35 mmHg when depressed systolic segment shortening indicated myocardial ischemia. Coronary constriction by neuropeptides Y persisted at coronary perfusion pressure of 35 mmHg and was only attenuated by indomethacin. We conclude that in contrast to systemic effects, coronary vasodilatation by neurotensin is mediated by a prostanoid product of cyclooxygenase. Preactivation of the prostaglandin system may explain why neurotensin lost its coronary dilator effect during myocardial ischemia. Neuropeptide Y may elicit coronary constriction in addition to mechanic reduction of coronary flow resembling severe coronary stenosis.