Objectives: Chemotherapy increases the risk of thromboembolism in patients with cancer. Although thrombocytopenia is a known side effect of chemotherapy, reactive thrombocytosis related to chemotherapy is uncommonly reported. The present study aimed to determine the incidence of gemcitabine-related thrombocytosis and the associated risk of thromboembolism. Methods: Medical records of 250 consecutive patients with a malignant disease who received gemcitabine-based therapy were reviewed. A multivariate analysis was done to determine factors associated with thromboembolism. Results: A total of 220 eligible patients with a median age of 63 years (range 26–83) were identified. Of these 220 patients, 95% had advanced malignancy and 59% had received prior chemotherapy. A total of 69% of patients received a platinum combination. In all, 46% patients experienced thrombocytosis following chemotherapy, with a median platelet count of 632 × 10⁹/l (range 457–1,385). Twenty-three of the 220 patients experienced a vascular event within 6 weeks of treatment. Eleven patients with thrombocytosis experienced a vascular event compared with 10 patients without thrombocytosis (not significant). On multivariate analysis, leukocytosis (odds ratio 5.8, 95% confidence interval 2.1–15.8) and comorbid illnesses (odds ratio 4.1, 95% confidence interval 1.4–12.6) were correlated with thromboembolism. Conclusions: Although gemcitabine-based therapy has been associated with an increased incidence of thrombocytosis, it does not increase the risk of thromboembolism in cancer patients. Leukocytosis and comorbid illnesses do increase the risk of thromboembolism.

Background: Treatment for locally recurrent breast cancer poses a significant challenge because the benefits in local control must be weighed against the increased risk of side effects of the treatment. Frequently, patients have been heavily pre-treated with radiation and several types of chemotherapy. Moreover, they often present with large volumes of bulky disease, further complicating management. Hyperthermia can be used to improve the efficacy of radiation, particularly in the setting of recurrent disease. Methods: We reviewed our clinical and dosimetric experience of breast cancer patients who received hyperthermia and radiation for recurrent breast cancer from 2011 to 2017. Thirty-six patients were treated with hyperthermia and radiation. Median follow-up was 11 months. Thirty patients (83.3%) received prior radiotherapy. The most commonly used radiation fraction scheme was 32 Gy in 8 fractions. The median radiation dose at the time of recurrence was 35.5 Gy (range 20-64 Gy). Mild temperature hyperthermia was delivered two times per week. Results: The median repeat radiation volume was 574 cc (range 11-3620 cc). Electrons, conventional photons, and IMRT radiation techniques were used. IMRT was used for large and complex treatment volumes and showed acceptable doses to organs at risk. The overall response rate was 61.1%. Complete response was observed in 17 patients (47.2%), partial response in 5 patients (13.9%), stable disease in 11 patients (30.6%), and progressive disease in 3 patients (8.3%). Twenty-six patients experienced acute grade 1 and 2 toxicities, primarily pain and erythema; and 26 experienced long-term grade 1 and 2 toxicities, mainly hyperpigmentation and lymphedema. Three patients developed new ulcerations that healed with conservative management. One patient developed pulmonary fibrosis resulting in mild dyspnea on exertion. Conclusion: Hyperthermia and radiation provide good local control with a favorable side effect profile. Thermoradiotherapy may be offered to patients with recurrent breast cancer, including those with extensive volumes of disease.

No abstract