No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

The current knowledge on collisions between complex nuclei in the range 10-100 AMeV bombarding energy is reviewed in comparison with the essential features characterizing reactions below 10 AMeV and-partly-above 100 AMeV. The data are inspected for Recently, both models were used to explain the spectra of 6 electrons originating from heavy-ion reactions. Whereas the SFM (Frobrich and Stroth 1990) in its Langevin version is a universal function of the surface distance.

The annihilation of energetic (1.2 GeV) antiprotons is exploited to deposit maximum thermal excitation (up to 1000 MeV) in massive nuclei (Cu, Ho, Au, and U) while minimizing the contribution from collective excitation such as rotation, shape distortion, and compression. Excitation energy distributions ds͞dE ‫ء‬ are deduced from eventwise observation of the whole nuclear evaporation chain with two 4p detectors for neutrons and charged particles. The nuclei produced in this way are found to decay predominantly statistically, i.e., by evaporation.[ S0031-9007(96) The study of such decay modes of very highly excited nuclei as fission, multifragmentation, cracking, and vaporization is presently a major objective in nuclear physics because of its bearing on the lesser-known bulk properties of hot nuclear matter, such as heat capacity, specific heat, viscosity, and phase transitions. Unfortunately, the decay pattern is also very sensitive to the dynamics of the excitation process, especially when collective degrees of freedom like rotation, shape distortion, and compression are strongly induced. These may have to be envisaged in the most often used [1-3] heavy-ion reactions. This ambiguity makes it difficult to correlate the observed decay pattern with either thermally or dynamically induced decay.In order to minimize the influence of the entrance channel on the decay modes, we have, for the first time, investigated the nuclear excitation following annihilation of energetic antiprotons. Antiprotons annihilate on a single nucleon at the surface of, or even inside the nucleus, thereby producing a pion cloud containing an average of about 5 particles. Because of the high centerof-mass velocity (b c.m.0.63) of this cloud, it is focused forward into the nucleus. Since the pion momenta are comparable to the Fermi momentum of the nucleons in the nucleus, the pions heat the nucleus in a soft radiationlike way [4], probably even softer and more efficient than can be expected in proton-or other lightion-induced spallation reactions, which have also been exploited recently for this purpose [5][6][7].Intranuclear cascade (INC) calculations have been found to provide a reasonable description of this mechanism. They predict that the spin remains low (below maximum 25h) and that shape distortion and density compression are negligible [8], in contrast to what is expected in heavy-ion reactions. The reaction time for achievement of equilibrium conditions is only about 30 fm͞c or 10 222 s [9], which is much shorter in general than the dynamical period in heavy-ion reactions [10]. This is all the more important at high temperature (T ഠ 6 MeV) when the characteristic evaporation time reduces to t , 10 222 s, implying little cooling of the compound nucleus during heating.In this Letter we concentrate on the use of a new method to determine the thermal excitation energy produced with energetic antiprotons. This method is based on the eventwise observation of the whole nuclear evaporation chain, including both neutrons and charged particles...