Breast cancer emerges by a multistep process which can be broadly equated to transformation of normal cells via the steps of hyperplasia, premalignant change and in situ carcinoma. The elucidation of molecular interdependencies, which lead to development of primary breast cancer, its progression, and its formation of metastases is the main focus for new strategies targetted at prevention and treatment. Cytogenetic and molecular genetic analysis of breast cancer samples demonstrates that tumour development involves the accumulation of various genetic alterations including amplification of oncogenes and mutation or loss of tumour suppressor genes. Amplification of certain oncogenes with concomitant overexpression of the oncoprotein seems to be specific for certain histological types. Loss of normal tumour suppressor protein function can occur through sequential gene mutation events (somatic alteration) or through a single mutational event of a remaining normal copy, when a germline mutation is present. The second event is usually chromosome loss, mitotic recombination, or partial chromosome deletion. Chromosome loci 16q and 17p harbour tumour suppressor genes, which seem to be pathognomonic for the development or progression of a specific histological subtype. There are an overwhelming number of abnormalities that have been identified at the molecular level which fit the model of multistep carcinogenesis of breast cancer. When the functions of all of these genes are known and how they participate in malignant progression, we will have the tools for a more rational approach to diagnosis, prevention and treatment. This review deals only with the factors that are involved in the conversion of a normal breast cell into a malignant cell rather than those required for invasion and metastases. A key critical long-term step in the molecular analysis of breast cancer will be to link the specific molecular damage with the effects of environmental carcinogens.
Summary The development of familial and sporadic breast cancer is based on genetic alterations of tumoursuppressor genes, for which loss of heterozygosity (LOH) is one mechanism of gene inactivation.
For quantificative determination of ERBB2 gene amplification in archival human carcinoma specimens we have developed a rapid, non-radioactive approach, which is based on the differential polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and fluorescent DNA technique. Sequences from the ERBB2 gene and from a single-copy reference gene were amplified simultaneously by PCR, in which one of each primer pair was fluorescently labelled. PCR products were separated by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in an automated DNA sequencer and directly quantified after laser activation and emission scanning using appropriate software. This fluorescent differential polymerase chain reaction (fd-PCR) method was used for quantificative determination of ERBB2 gene amplification in 195 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded breast carcinoma tissues. ERBB2 gene amplification was found in 52 (26%) of these tumors and correlated significantly with tumor size, absence of estrogen receptor (ER) and pS2 expression, but not with absence of progesterone receptor (PR) or presence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R) expression, lymph-node metastases or grading. In univariate analysis, ERBB2 gene amplification showed no significant correlation with clinical outcome, either in the whole population or in the subgroup defined by positive axillary lymph-node metastases. However, within the node-negative subgroup, patients with ERBB2 gene amplification had significantly decreased relapse-free survival and overall survival (p < 0.05). The fd-PCR assay is a valuable tool for determination of amplification of ERBB2 gene as well as further oncogenes. In this way, more detailed information about individual tumor biology may be acquired by a routine assay.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.