This paper reports on a functional evaluation of prosthetic feet based on gait analysis. The aim is to analyse prosthetic feet behaviour under loads applied during gait in order to quantify user benefits for each foot. Ten traumatic amputees (six trans-tibial and four trans-femoral) were tested using their own prosthetic foot. An original protocol is presented to calculate the forefoot kinematics together with the overall body kinematics and ground reaction forces during gait. In this work, sagittal motion of the prosthetic ankle and the forefoot, time-distance parameters and ground reaction forces were examined. It is shown that an analysis of not only trans-tibial but also trans-femoral amputees provides an insight in the performance of prosthetic feet. Symmetry and prosthetic propulsive force were proved to be mainly dependant on amputation level. In contrast, the flexion of the prosthetic forefoot and several timedistance parameters are highly influenced by foot design. Correlations show influential of foot and ankle kinematics on other parameters. These results suggest that prosthetic foot efficiency depends simultaneously on foot design and gait style. The evaluation, proposed in this article, associated to clinical examination should help to achieve the best prosthetic foot match to a patient.

This paper reports a comparison of the gait patterns of trans-femoral amputees using a single-axis prosthetic knee that coordinates ankle and knee flexions (Proteor's Hydracadence system) with the gait patterns of patients using other knee joints without a knee-ankle link and the gait patterns of individuals with normal gait. The two patient groups were composed of 11 male trans-femoral amputees: six patients had the Hydracadence joint (Group 1) and five patients had other prosthetic knees (Group 2). The reference group was made up of 23 normal volunteers (Group 3). In this work, trunk, hip, knee, and ankle 3-D motion was assessed using the VICON system. Kinetic data were collected by two AMTI force plates, and the knee moment was calculated via the 3-D equilibrium equations. An original questionnaire was used to assess the participants' activity level and clinical background. The results reveal that, during stance, all knee types guaranteed security. After heel strike, the plantar flexion of the ankle enabled by the Hydracadence prosthesis seems to increase stability. During swing phase, hip and knee sagittal motion was nearly the same in both Group 1 and Group 2. By contrast, hallux and sole vertical positions were significantly higher in Group 1 than in Group 2; thus, it seems the link between the ankle joint and the knee joint makes foot clearance easier. No alteration of the lateral bending of the trunk was observed. The protocol proposed in this paper allows a functional comparison between prosthetic components by combining clinical data with objective 3-D kinematic and kinetic information. It might help to determine which prosthetic knees are best for a specific patient.

For about 15 years, technical advances in prosthetic treatment have been the main factor in the increased performance of athletes with lower-limb amputation. For trans-tibial amputation, the prosthesis for sprinting is composed of a gel liner and a socket joined by a locking or virtual vacuum liner. Because of these dynamic properties, the carbon prosthetic foot equipped with tacks ensures outstanding performance. For trans-femoral amputation, a hydraulic swing and a stance control unit are added to the same prosthesis. In comparison with the able-bodied runner, athletes with amputation have smaller loading times in the prosthetic limb and larger ones in the sound limb. The length of the energy-storing prosthetic foot is determined by the "up-on-the-toes" running gait. The sprinting gait with trans-tibial amputation is almost symmetrical. The hip extensor effort is the main compensation of propulsion reduction with lower-limb amputation. With trans-femoral amputation, the lack of knee increases the asymmetry. The total prosthetic knee extension (early in late-swing phase and lasting during total stance phase) compensates with extension of both hips, especially the opposite one. The amputation and sound limb load transfer with lumbar hyperlordosis concern the pelvis, trunk and shoulders. Because of athletes with amputation, research in prosthetic treatment has progressed. The development of orthotics and prostheses for such athletes has benefited non-athletes with amputation.

No abstract