It is inappropriate to include the HDLN in the distant metastatic lymph node group in gastric cancer. The seventh AJCC criteria for node grouping should be revised.

Background Appendiceal orifice inflammation (AOI) is commonly considered a skip lesion in ulcerative colitis (UC). However, the clinical significance of AOI in UC patients remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical feature and long-term outcomes of AOI by comparing UC patients with and without AOI. Methods This study was conducted as a retrospective design of patients who were newly diagnosed or referred within 3 months after diagnosis at Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2020. All patients underwent index and follow-up colonoscopies. The long-term outcomes involved achieving complete endoscopic remission (ER), use of biologics, hospitalization, and proximal disease extension. Complete ER was defined as Mayo endoscopic subscore 0. Results In total, 318 UC patients were included, of which 140 had AOI. The baseline characteristics were not significantly different between AOI and non-AOI groups. The cumulative risk of complete ER was a significant difference between AOI and non-AOI groups (p=0.041). The other cumulative risks of disease outcomes were not significantly different between AOI and non-AOI groups (use of biologics, p=0.542; hospitalization, p=0.795; proximal disease extension, p=0.403). The multivariate Cox regression analysis also revealed that AOI was the only significant factor of complete ER (hazard ratio, 0.636; 95% confidence interval, 0.446–0.906; p=0.012) in UC patients. Conclusion AOI shows a significant association with lower rate of complete ER in UC patients. Therefore, a meticulous treatment strategy may be recommended to achieve complete ER in UC patients with AOI.

Background Since the consensus-based diagnostic algorithm for intestinal Behcet’s disease (iBD) was proposed by the IBD Study Group of the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases, there were few studies regarding the prognosis of iBD according to the diagnostic algorithm. Methods We reviewed the medical records of patients who had ileocecal ulcers with clinical impression of iBD from March 1986 to August 2019 in Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital and evaluated factors at the time of diagnosis which were related with adverse events (AEs, major operation or admission from iBD) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results Among 204 eligible patients, a total of 163 were included in the study after exclusion of 41 patients with ileocecal ulcers from other disorders. The male-to-female ratio was 1:1 and the mean age at the time of diagnosis was 48.9 ± 15.9. The number of definite, probable, suspected, and non-diagnostic iBD was 18 (11.0%), 64 (39.3%), 37 (22.7%), and 44 (27.0%), respectively. Patients with definite, probable, and suspected iBD developed more AEs compared with patients with non-diagnostic iBD (p = 0.026). After exclusion of patients with non-diagnostic iBD, univariate analysis showed accompanying haematologic disorders, haemoglobin <10 g/dl, fever, colonic involvement, and hypoalbuminemia (<3.0 g/dl) were significantly related to the development of AEs (all p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed accompanying haematologic disorders, haemoglobin <10 g/dl, fever, and colonic involvement were significantly associated with development of AE (all p < 0.05). Poor DFS was significantly associated with accompanying with haematologic disorders, haemoglobin <10 g/dl, and colonic involvement (p < 0.001, p = 0.022, and p = 0.034) in univariate analysis. Only haemoglobin <10 g/dl was significant in multivariate analysis. Conclusion Patients with definite, probable, and suspected iBD have a poor prognosis compared with patients with non-diagnostic iBD. Accompanying with haematologic disorders, anaemia, fever, and colonic involvement at the time of diagnosis are poor prognostic factors in patients with iBD.