No abstract

The first clinical MR-IGRT system was validated for real-time tracking and gating capabilities and shown to be reliable and accurate. Patient workflow methods were developed for efficient treatment. Periodic quality assurance tests can be efficiently performed with commercially available equipment to ensure accurate system performance.

Purpose: Severe artifacts in kilovoltage-CT simulation images caused by large metallic implants can significantly degrade the conspicuity and apparent CT Hounsfield number of targets and anatomic structures, jeopardize the confidence of anatomical segmentation, and introduce inaccuracies into the radiation therapy treatment planning process. This study evaluated the performance of the first commercial orthopedic metal artifact reduction function (O-MAR) for radiation therapy, and investigated its clinical applications in treatment planning. Methods: Both phantom and clinical data were used for the evaluation. The CIRS electron density phantom with known physical (and electron) density plugs and removable titanium implants was scanned on a Philips Brilliance Big Bore 16-slice CT simulator. The CT Hounsfield numbers of density plugs on both uncorrected and O-MAR corrected images were compared. Treatment planning accuracy was evaluated by comparing simulated dose distributions computed using the true density images, uncorrected images, and O-MAR corrected images. Ten CT image sets of patients with large hip implants were processed with the O-MAR function and evaluated by two radiation oncologists using a five-point score for overall image quality, anatomical conspicuity, and CT Hounsfield number accuracy. By utilizing the same structure contours delineated from the O-MAR corrected images, clinical IMRT treatment plans for five patients were computed on the uncorrected and O-MAR corrected images, respectively, and compared. Results: Results of the phantom study indicated that CT Hounsfield number accuracy and noise were improved on the O-MAR corrected images, especially for images with bilateral metal implants. The γ pass rates of the simulated dose distributions computed on the uncorrected and O-MAR corrected images referenced to those of the true densities were higher than 99.9% (even when using 1% and 3 mm distance-to-agreement criterion), suggesting that dose distributions were clinically identical. In all patient cases, radiation oncologists rated O-MAR corrected images as higher quality. Formerly obscured critical structures were able to be visualized. The overall image quality and the conspicuity in critical organs were significantly improved compared with the uncorrected images: overall quality score (1.35 vs 3.25, P = 0.0022); bladder (2.15 vs 3.7, P = 0.0023); prostate and seminal vesicles/vagina (1.3 vs 3.275, P = 0.0020); rectum (2.8 vs 3.9, P = 0.0021). The noise levels of the selected ROIs were reduced from 93.7 to 38.2 HU. On most cases (8/10), the average CT Hounsfield numbers of the prostate/vagina on the O-MAR corrected images were closer to the referenced value (41.2 HU, an average measured from patients without metal implants) than those on the uncorrected images. High γ pass rates of the five IMRT dose distribution pairs indicated that the dose distributions were not significantly affected by the CT image improvements. Conclusions: Overall, this study indicated that the O-MAR function can remark...

Purpose/Objectives Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly used to treat oligometastatic or unresectable primary malignancy, although proximity of organs-at-risk (OAR) may limit delivery of sufficiently ablative dose. Magnetic resonance (MR)-based online-adaptive radiotherapy (ART) has potential to improve SBRT’s therapeutic ratio. This study characterizes potential advantages of online-adaptive MR-guided SBRT to treat oligometastatic disease of the non-liver abdomen and central thorax. Materials/Methods Ten patients treated with RT for unresectable primary or oligometastatic disease of the non-liver abdomen (n=5) or central thorax (n=5) underwent imaging throughout treatment on a clinical MR-IGRT system. SBRT plans were created based on tumor/OAR anatomy at initial CT simulation (PI) and simulated adaptive plans were created based on observed MR-image set tumor/OAR “anatomy-of-the-day” (PA). Each PA was planned under workflow constraints to simulate online-ART. Prescribed dose was 50Gy/5fractions with goal coverage of 95% PTV by 95% of the prescription, subject to hard OAR constraints. PI was applied to each MR dataset and compared to PA to evaluate changes in dose delivered to tumor/OARs, with dose escalation when possible. Results Hard OAR constraints were met for all PI based on anatomy from initial CT simulation, and all PA based on anatomy from each daily MR-image set. Application of the PI to anatomy-of-the-day caused OAR constraint violation in 19/30 cases. Adaptive planning increased PTV coverage in 21/30 cases, including 14 cases where hard OAR constraints were violated by the non-adaptive plan. For 9 PA cases, decreased PTV coverage was required to meet hard OAR constraints that would have been violated in a non-adaptive setting. Conclusions Online-adaptive MRI-guided SBRT may allow PTV dose escalation and/or simultaneous OAR sparing compared to non-adaptive SBRT. A prospective clinical trial is underway at our institution to evaluate clinical outcomes of this technique.

No abstract