DIF serration pattern analysis is not restricted by variation in laboratory procedures, transport medium, or experience of observers. This learnable technique can be implemented as a routine diagnostic method as an extension of DIF microscopy for subtyping PD.

BackgroundThe demonstration of tissue-bound immunoreactants by direct immunofluorescence microscopy (DIF) is a valuable parameter in the diagnosis of various autoimmune and immunecomplex-mediated skin diseases. For preservation of tissue-bound immunoreactants, biopsies are usually fresh-frozen in liquid nitrogen or transported in Michel's fixative. But even optimally preserved tissue specimens are no guarantee for the correct diagnosis by DIF, especially when weak to moderate IgG fluorescence of the epidermal basement membrane zone is involved. In such cases false negative results are easily obtained due to the relatively high dermal "background" fluorescence produced by polyclonal anti-human IgG fluorescein conjugates.MethodsIn the present study we have compared the use of normal saline (0.9% NaCl) with liquid nitrogen and Michel's fixative as transport medium for skin biopsies. From 25 patients with an autoimmune skin disease (pemphigus, pemphigoid, lupus erythematosus and vasculitis) four matched skin biopsies were obtained and transported in either saline for 24 and 48 hours, liquid nitrogen, or Michel's fixative for 48 hours.ResultsDirect IF microscopy showed significant reduction of background fluorescence (p < 0.01) and relatively enhanced desired specific (IgG, IgA) staining in biopsies transported in saline. A conclusive or tentative IF diagnosis was reached in 92% after 24 h saline, 83% after 48 h saline, 68% after freezing in liquid nitrogen, and 62% after 48 h Michel's medium (n = 25).ConclusionsWe conclude that transporting biopsies without freezing in normal saline for 24 hours is an adequate and attractive method for routine IF diagnosis in autoimmune and immune complex-mediated dermatoses. The superior results with saline incubation are explained by washing away of IgG background in dermis and epidermis.

We present a case of inflammatory epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA) with IgA antibodies to plectin. Analysis of lesional skin biopsies by electron microscopy revealed the split level to be in the sublamina densa zone, corresponding to the diagnosis of EBA. Direct immunofluorescence of perilesional skin demonstrated u-serrated depositions of IgG and IgA that under immunoelectron microscopy were shown to be located in the sublamina densa. In contrast, indirect immunofluorescence on salt-split skin revealed circulating IgA antibodies that stained the roof rather than the floor of the blister. Immunoblotting showed these serum antibodies to be directed to the cytoplasmic hemidesmosomal antigen plectin. The antiplectin specificity of these antibodies was confirmed by 'knockout' immunofluorescence analysis; the serum IgA did not bind to skin sections of a patient with plectin-deficient epidermolysis bullosa. To our knowledge, this case demonstrates for the first time the existence of IgA antibodies against plectin.