The development of high performance composites from a cheap natural fiber, jute, as reinforcement is particularly significant from an economic point of view. In this work, jute fiber‐unsaturated polyester(GP) composites having appreciable mechanical properties were prepared by using solution impregnation and hot curing methods. Both unbleached (control) and bleached jute slivers with various percentages of fiber loadings were used to prepare the composites and were named JPH (C) i.e., Jute Polyester Hot Curing (control), and JPH (B) i.e., Jute Polyester Hot Curing (bleached), respectively. Mechanical properties such as tensile and flexural strain, toughness, and moduli of both the grades have been compared. Composites having 60 wt% of jute fiber yielded the best results. JPH (B) showed much better flexural properties than JPH (C), although the tensile properties of the latter were better. The inter‐laminar shear strength (ILSS) of the JPH (B) was found to be higher than JPH (C). The nature of fiber‐resin bonding was studied from scanning electron micrographs of the specimens subjected to tensile and flexural fracture. Dynamic mechanical properties were found to be very high, superior even to those of glass fiber reinforced composites. The flexural storage modulus was found to be 12.3 GPa at 30°C and to decrease slowly with temperature. The major finding in this work is the attainment of high mechanical properties of composite specimens with 60 wt %fiber loading. On a weight and cost basis, bleached jute fibres were found to be better reinforcements than other fibers with usual surface modification by coating or grafting processes.

No abstract

Jute–polyester composites were fabricated with untreated (control) and bleached slivers with 60% loading of fiber by weight and were designated as JPH(C) and JPH(B), respectively. Both types of composite specimens were subjected to water absorption and outdoor weathering tests to assess their relative performance under environmental conditions. While both composites showed low water absorption, JPH(B) showed lesser water absorption (8.48%) than did JPH(C) (12.25%). The mechanical properties like tensile and flexural strengths were measured for both the weathered and unweathered specimens and compared. The tensile strength of JPH(C) and JPH(B) decreased while the tensile modulus increased after weathering. The flexural strength, moduli, and ILSS of the weathered specimens were less than those of the unweathered ones. The nature of the fiber–matrix adhesion could be established from these results. The cause of every observation is explained. Thermal analyses (TG/DTG and DSC) of the composite specimens were also done. The overall thermal stability of JPH(C) was found to be better than that of JPH(B). © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 78: 1671–1679, 2000

No abstract

No abstract