No abstract

No abstract

This paper reports the results of experimentation carried out to compare the ability of mineral acids (HCl and H2SO4) and cellulase enzyme (from Trichoderma reesei QM 9414) in the saccharification of corn‐cob, groundnut shell, sugarcane bagasse and wheat straw. With the exception of corn‐cobs, acids proved to be better saccharifying agents than the cellulase complex, but the former gave a poor substrate for alcoholic fermentation since the saccharified mashes contained large amounts of pentoses which are not metabolized by most strains of yeast. In addition, both acids and enzymes have been found to be substrate specific. Maximal saccharification of groundnut shell, sugarcane bagasse and wheat straw were obtained with sulphuric acid at 15.0, 5.0 and 5.0% (v/v) under 15, 15 and 15 psi pressure for 15, 30 and 30 min, respectively; whereas hydrochloric acid at 7.5% (v/v) with. autoclaving for 30 min at 10 psi resulted in maximum saccharification of corn‐cob. However, the order of susceptibility of substrates to enzymatic attack was corn‐cob > wheat straw > sugarcane bagasse > groundnut shell. Increase in enzyme concentration (1–4 IU ml−1) and treatment duration (12–72 h) improved saccharification, but increases in substrate concentration (>5.0%, w/v) had an inhibitory effect on the hydrolytic ability of the cellulase enzyme complex. Of the various substrate‐acid ratios tested, a ratio of 1:8 was found to be optimal for the eflcient hydrolysis of the substrates under study.

Both free and immobilized cells of Sporolactobacillus cellulosolvens, in continuous culture on molasses (50 g sugar 1(-1)) at 40°C, had maximum lactic acid productivities of 0.03 and 0.06 mol l(-1) h, at dilution rates of 0.27 and 0.25 h(-1), respectively.

The paper reports the evaluation of potentials of acid (HCl and H2SO4) and enzymatically (cellulase) saccharified corncob, groundnut shell, sugarcane bagasse and wheat straw biopolymers for ethanol production. Of the three yeast isolates tested, Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. ellipsoideus was found to be most efficient, closely followed by Kluyveromyces marxianus NCYC 179 in its ability to ferment enzymatically hydrolysed mash of all the substrates tested to ethanol. However, S. cerevisiae NCYC 240 and acid hydrolysed agricultural polymers were found to be a poor organism and poor substrates, respectively, for ethanol fermentation. The order of ethanol production on substrate basis was corncob > wheat straw > sugarcane bagasse > groundnut shell biomass biopolymer. An incubation period of 24 h was found optimum for the optimal production of ethanol by S. cerevisiae var. ellipsoideus in both acid and enzymatically hydrolysed agricultural residues.