The extraction of disease specific information from Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of human body fluids demands the highest standards of accuracy and reproducibility of measurements because the expected spectral differences between healthy and diseased subjects are very small in relation to a large background absorbance of the whole sample. Here, we demonstrate that with the increased sensitivity of modern FTIR spectrometers, automatisation of sample preparation and modern bioinformatics, it is possible to identify and validate spectral biomarker candidates for distinguishing between urinary bladder cancer (UBC) and inflammation in suspected bladder cancer patients. The current dataset contains spectra of blood serum and plasma samples of 135 patients. All patients underwent cytology and pathological biopsy characterization to distinguish between patients without UBC (46) and confirmed UBC cases (89). A minimally invasive blood test could spare control patients a repeated cystoscopy including a transurethral biopsy, and three-day stationary hospitalisation. Blood serum, EDTA and citrate plasma were collected from each patient and processed following predefined strict standard operating procedures. Highly reproducible dry films were obtained by spotting sub-nanoliter biofluid droplets in defined patterns, which were compared and optimized. Particular attention was paid to the automatisation of sample preparation and spectral preprocessing to exclude errors by manual handling. Spectral biomarker candidates were identified from absorbance spectra and their 1(st) and 2(nd) derivative spectra using an advanced Random Forest (RF) approach. It turned out that the 2(nd) derivative spectra were most useful for classification. Repeat validation on 21% of the dataset not included in predictor training with Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) classifiers and Random Forests (RFs) yielded a sensitivity of 93 ± 10% and a specificity of 46 ± 18% for bladder cancer. The low specificity can be most likely attributed to the unbalanced and small number of control samples. Using this approach, spectral biomarker candidates in blood-derived biofluids were identified, which allow us to distinguish between cancer and inflammation, but the observed differences were tiny. Obviously, a much larger sample number has to be investigated to reliably validate such candidates.
Multi-walledcarbon nanotube (MWCNT) filters have been recentlysynthesisedwhich have specificmolecular filteringcapabilities and good mechanical strength. Optical and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) reveals the formation of highly aligned arrays of bundles of carbon nanotubes having lengths up to 500 µm. The Raman spectra of this material along with four other carbonaceous materials, commercially available single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) and MWCNTs, graphitised porous carbon (Carbotrap) and graphite have been recorded using two-excitation wavelengths, 532 and 785 nm, and analysed for band positions and shape with special emphasis paid to the D-, G-and G -bands. A major difference between the different MWCNT varieties analysed is that G-bands in the MWCNT filters exhibit almost no dispersion, whereas the other MWCNTs show a noticeable dispersive behaviour with a change in the excitation wavelength. Spectral features similar to those of the MWCNTfilter varieties were observed for the Carbotrap material. From the line shape analysis, the intensity ratio, I D /I G , of the more ordered MWCNT filter material using the integral G-band turns out to be two times lower than that of the less ordered MWCNT filter product at both excitation wavelengths. This parameter can, therefore, be used as a measure of the degree of MWCNT alignment in filter varieties, which is well supported also by our SEM study.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.