The efficiency of different methods for sampling semipelagic animals was compared in the deep basins of Lake Paasivesi and Lake Puruvesi of the complex Lake Saimaa, Finland, during 1990-92. Certain semipelagic animals, such as Mysis relicta, amphipods and larvae of ChaoborusJlavicans, are important bioindicators of water and benthic quality. However, owing to their high mobility and vertical migrations they are difficult to sample quantitatively with traditional benthic methods.The equipment used for sampling was comprised of: 1. Vertical nets (0.56 and 0.13 m2) placed on the bottom for 5 minutes or 12 hours and hauled up vertically. 2. Plexiglass traps placed on the bottom for 12-14 hours. 3. Mysis-trawl hauled horizontally c. 250-300 metres on the bottom. 4. Ekman-grab.In 1992, parallel samples were taken with vertically hauled nets (12 h and plexiglass traps baited with fish or liver or provided with a chemical light. Large vertically hauled nets were the most efficient equipment for catching Gammaracanthus lacustris, M. relicta and larvae of Ch. Jlavicans whilst baited or lighted nets were less effective. Lighted plexiglass traps were most effective in catching Pallasea quadrispinosa and water mites, but baited and control traps sampled inefficiently. The trawl sampled M. relicta and P quadrispinosa relatively well, but was less efficient in sampling other groups. The Ekman-grab was effective only for sampling Monoporeia aflnis.The semipelagic community differed between the studied basins. The dominant semipelagic animals in the humic, deep L. Paasivesi were M. relicta, amphipods and larvae of Ch. fivicans whilst the number of water mites was low in the catches. In the shallower, clear-water L. Puruvesi the densities of crustaceans and Chaoborus-larvae were low whilst some water mites, such as Pionapusilla, occurred in high numbers. Nocturnal sampling was more effective, especially for M. relicta.

No abstract