A substantive amendment to this systematic review was last made on 21 February 2000. Cochrane reviews are regularly checked and updated if necessary. ABSTRACT Background: Exclusive breastfeeding until around six months of age, followed by the introduction of solids with continued breastfeeding, is considered to be the optimal nutritional start for newborn infants. Objectives: To determine whether the exclusivity and duration of breastfeeding is affected by giving mothers commercial discharge packs in hospital which contain artificial formula or promotional material for artificial formula. These packs are those which are commonly given to mothers on leaving hospital after giving birth (thus discharge packs). Search strategy: Comprehensive electronic search of the register of clinical trials maintained and updated by the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group and CINAHL and MEDLINE. Selection criteria: All randomised controlled trials with or without blinding to examine the effects of commercial discharge packs on breastfeeding.Participants: Consenting postpartum women who initiate breastfeeding while in hospital or immediately upon discharge.Interventions: Commercial discharge packs which contain free samples of infant formula or promotional material versus non‐commercial discharge packs (specifically those from which free samples of infant formula have been removed or have been replaced with, e.g., breast pads) or no pack.Main outcome measures: The proportion of women breastfeeding at six weeks and 3 months (13 weeks) postpartum.Other outcomes: Rates of breastfeeding at other fixed time points between 0 and 6 months postpartum. Data collection and analysis: Data were extracted by one reviewer and checked by a second reviewer. Main results: Nine randomised controlled trials involving a total of 3730 women were analysed. The studies only included women from North America. The meta‐analysis showed that when comparing commercial discharge packs with any of the controls (no intervention, non‐commercial pack and combinations of these), exclusive breastfeeding was reduced at all time points in the presence of commercial hospital discharge packs.There was no evidence to support the conjecture that use of hospital discharge packs causes the early termination of non‐exclusive breastfeeding. Where the introduction of solid food was measured, giving a commercial pack (with or without formula) reduced the time before solid food was introduced. Reviewers' conclusions: The giving of commercial hospital discharge packs (with or without formula) appears to reduce the number of women exclusively breastfeeding at all times but has no significant effect upon the earlier termination of non‐exclusive breastfeeding. Citation: Donnelly A, Snowden HM, Renfrew MJ, Woolridge MW. Commercial hospital discharge packs for breastfeeding women (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2000. Oxford: Update Software. The preceding reports are abstracts of regularly updated, systematic reviews prepared and maintained by the Cochrane Collaboration. The full texts of the reviews are available in The Cochrane Library (ISSN 1464‐780X).The Cochrane Library is prepared and published by Update Software Ltd. All rights reserved. See www.update‐software.com or contact Update Software,info@update.co.uk, for information on subscribing to The Cochrane Library in your area. Update Software Ltd, Summertown Pavilion, Middle Way, Oxford OX2 7LG, UK (Tel: +44 1865 513902; Fax: +44 1865 516918).
It is estimated that between 0.2 and 0.4 per cent of the population suffer from chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME). Service provision varies across the UK, and while there is a good evidence for the efficacy of cognitive behavioural therapy and graded exercise programmes, the evidence for group interventions is still limited. Here, the authors describe the results of their service evaluation of a group treatment programme for CFS/ME. Copyright © 2009 Wiley Interface Ltd
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.