Animal studies that compare antibiotics have used only a limited number of doses administered at intervals chosen without regard for their pharmacodynamic effects of pharmacokinetic profiles. We compared the relative efficacy and potency of three beta-lactams and two aminoglycosides in lung and thigh-infection models in neutropenic mice by defining the maximum attainable antimicrobial effect at 24 h (Emax) and the total dose required to reach 50% of maximum effect (P50) at several dosing intervals. For beta-lactams, Emaxs were similar, whereas P50s increased 10- to 50-fold with longer intervals in both models. Aminoglycosides were significantly more bactericidal in the lung than in the thigh, and dosing interval had little impact on P50s in either model. Recognizing the variable impact of dosing interval on efficacy for different classes of antibiotics is mandatory for the proper design and interpretation of comparative trials.
The present communication concerns a quantitative study on the production and kinetics of mononuclear phagocytes during an acute inflammatory response as compared with the steady-state condition. During an acute inflammation induced by an intraperitoneal injection of NBCS, the peritoneal macrophages increase 2.5 times and there is a concomitant threefold increase of the monocytes in the peripheral blood. This increase of the peritoneal macrophages could be caused by a local proliferation of these cells or by the recruitment of monocytes from the circulation. The results of the in vitro and pulse-labeling studies demonstrate that the mitotic activity of the peritoneal macrophages is not increased during the inflammatory response, which indicates that the increase in the number of these cells is not due to local proliferation. Evidence is also presented that the small proportion (maximally 4%) of peritoneal macrophages that synthesize DNA are very recently arrived from the circulation. In agreement with this is the finding that a small number (less than 3%) of the peripheral blood monocytes are capable of synthesizing DNA. Since proof was obtained that the macrophages in the inflammatory peritoneal exudate originate from peripheral blood monocytes and the number of these cells in the circulation was also augmented, an increased formation of monocytes in the bone marrow was expected. Because increased monocyte production could be brought about by an increased number of promonocytes and/or an acceleration of the mitotic activity of the promonocytes, the various parameters of the cell cycle of these cells were determined. In normal mice the DNA-synthesis time of the promonocytes was 11.8 h, the cell cycle time 16.2 h, and the G1 + G2 + M phases 4.4 h. During the first 12 h of the inflammatory response a significantly shorter DNA-synthesis time (7.6 h) and cell cycle time (10.8 h) was found. At 24 h, these values approximated those found in normal mice. Next, both the total production and the rate of production of the monocytes were calculated and compared for both conditions. This computation showed that the total production of labeled monocytes during the first 48 h of an acute inflammation was 64% greater than in normal mice. The rate of production, calculated in two ways (i.e., from the data of the total production and also from the data of the cell cycle time together with the total number of promonocytes) complemented each other very well. During the first 12 h of the inflammatory response the production rate was increased 1.5 times and then leveled off, reaching almost the normal rate after 24 h. Furthermore, the excellent agreement between the results of the two methods of calculation for the normal steady state confirmed once more that the promonocyte is the direct precursor cell of the monocyte, giving rise to the two monocytes after each division. The kinetics of the monocytes in the peripheral blood was also altered during the inflammatory response. During the first 48 h, twice the normal number of labeled monocytes went from the bone marrow to the peripheral blood and twice the normal number also left the circulation. Furthermore, at least 70% of this increased number of labeled monocytes leaving the circulation migrated into the inflammatory exudate of the peritoneal cavity, leading to a roughly 11-fold increase of labeled peritoneal macrophages.
AimsTo characterize the pharmacokinetics of fumarates in healthy subjects. MethodsTen subjects received a single fumarate tablet (containing 120 mg of dimethylfumarate and 95 mg of calcium-monoethylfumarate) in the fasted state and after a standardized breakfast in randomized order. Prior to and at fixed intervals after the dose, blood samples were drawn and the concentrations of monomethylfumarate, the biologically active metabolite, as well as dimethylfumarate and fumaric acid were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography. ResultsAfter a lag time, a transient increase in serum monomethylfumarate concentrations in the blood was observed, whereas dimethylfumarate and fumaric acid concentrations remained below the detection limit. The t lag was 240 min [range 60-603 min; 95% confidence interval (CI) 139, 471] shorter when the tablet was taken after an overnight fast (90 min; range 60-120 min; 95% CI 66, 107) than when taken with breakfast (300 min; range 180-723 min; 95% CI 0, 1002). The t max was 241 min (range 60-1189 min, 95% CI 53, 781) shorter when the tablet was taken after an overnight fast (182 min; range 120-240 min; 95% CI 146, 211) than when taken with breakfast (361 min; range 240-1429 min; 95% CI 0, 1062). The mean C max for monomethylfumarate in the blood of fasting subjects was to 0.84 mg l -1 (range 0.37-1.29 mg l -1 ; 95% CI 0.52, 1.07) and did not differ from that in fed subjects (0.48 mg l -1 ; range 0-1.22 mg l -1 ; 95% CI 0, 5.55). ConclusionsThe pharmacokinetics of monomethylfumarate in healthy subjects after a single tablet of fumarate are highly variable, particularly after food intake. Further experiments exploring the pharmacokinetics of oral fumarates are warranted in order to elucidate the mechanisms underlying variability in reponse in patients.
The relative efficacy of different aminoglycosides or of different dosage schedules of the same aminoglycoside should be quantitated and related to relative toxicity. Quantitative experimental indicators of efficacy should not only include MIC and MBC, but also the postantibiotic effect in vitro and in vivo, the emergence of resistance in in-vitro and in-vivo models, and the relationship between plasma concentration profiles and efficacy. Parameters of clinical efficacy are to be related to pharmacokinetic parameters such as the ratio between the peak serum concentration and the MIC.Toxicity in clinical trials should be assessed by the most sensitive methods available. Experimental and clinical studies have shown cortical uptake to be a sensitive indicator of renal toxicity. As far as ototoxicity is concerned endolymph and perilymph pharmacoldnetics are not dearly related. Chnical ototoxicity should be assessed by sensitive methods, such as high frequency tone audiometry. Finally, risk factors for nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity (e.g., duration of treatment, associated nephrotoxk drugs, dehydration) should be assessed in the evaluation of clinical trials.
Aims Experimental studies have suggested that constant intravenous infusion would be preferable to conventional intermittent bolus administration of beta‐lactam antibiotics for serious Gram‐negative infections. Severe melioidosis (Burkholderia pseudomallei infection) carries a mortality over 40% despite treatment with high dose ceftazidime. The aim of this study was to measure the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of continuous infusion of ceftazidime vs intermittent bolus dosing in septicaemic melioidosis.Methods Patients with suspected septicaemic melioidosis were randomised to receive ceftazidime 40 mg kg−1 8 hourly by bolus injection or 4 mg kg−1 h−1 by constant infusion following a 12 mg kg−1 priming dose and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were compared.Results Of the 34 patients studied 16 (59%) died. Twenty patients had cultures positive for B. pseudomallei of whom 12 (60%) died. The median MIC90 of B. pseudomallei was 2 mg l−1, giving a minimum target concentration (4*MIC) of 8 mg l−1. The median (range) estimated total apparent volume of distribution, systemic clearance and terminal elimination half‐lives of ceftazidime were 0.468 (0.241–0.573) l kg−1, 0.058 (0.005–0.159) l kg−1 h−1 and 7.74 (1.95–44.71) h, respectively. Clearance of ceftazidime and creatinine clearance were correlated closely (r = 0.71; P < 0.001) and there was no evidence of significant nonrenal clearance.Conclusions Simulations based on these data and the ceftazidime sensitivity of the B. pseudomallei isolates indicated that administration by constant infusion would allow significant dose reduction and cost saving. With conventional 8 h intermittent dosing to patients with normal renal function, plasma ceftazidime concentrations could fall below the target concentration but this would be unlikely with a constant infusion. Correction for renal failure, which is common in patients with meliodosis is Clearance =k* creatinine clearance where k = 0.72. Calculation of a loading dose gives median (range) values of loading dose, DL of 18.7 mg kg−1 (9.5–23) and infusion rate I = 3.5 mg kg−1 h−1 (0.4–13) (which equals 84 mg kg−1 day−1). A nomogram for adjustment in renal failure is given.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.