The pharmacokinetics of reboxetine, a new antidepressant agent, were found to be close to linear in a crossover study comparing administration of single 2, 3, 4, and 5 mg capsule doses in 15 healthy male volunteers, and in the same study the capsules were bioequivalent to the proposed therapeutic tablet formulation (4 mg). Kinetic analysis was based on HPLC assay of reboxetine in plasma and urine collected up to 72 h after each administration. Plasma levels indicated a rapid absorption (tmax approximately equal to 2 h) and an elimination half-life of about 13 h. Clearance and volume of distribution were modest (ratios to bioavailability: CL/F approximately equal to 29 mL min-1; Vz/F approximately equal to 32 L); urinary excretion was approximately 9% of dose, corresponding to a renal clearance of only 3 mL min-1 (a value consistent with the rate of glomerular filtration of unbound drug). In vitro, binding to plasma proteins, estimated from radioactivity levels following dialysis of 14C-labelled reboxetine, appeared to be dominated by alpha 1-acid glycoprotein without marked saturation up to plasma concentrations of over 500 ng mL-1 (2.8-3.1% unbound with human plasma from three additional volunteers; 1.8-2.0% for 2 gL-1 orosomucoid alpha 1-acid glycoprotein, and 46.4-47.4% for 40 g L-1 albumin), whilst the mean Cmax in the current study was much lower (164 ng mL-1 after a 5mg dose).

No abstract

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study using 12 healthy men was designed to evaluate pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions when nefazodone and haloperidol are coadministered. Two groups of six subjects each received a 5-mg oral dose of haloperidol or a placebo on study days 1 and 2. Nefazodone, 200 mg, was administered to all 12 subjects twice daily (every 12 hours) on study days 3 to 9; on study day 10, only the morning dose of nefazodone was administered. On study days 9 and 10, all subjects also received 5 mg of haloperidol or a placebo along with the morning dose of nefazodone. Serial blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected from each subject over a 12-hour period after the morning dose on study days 1, 2, 9, and 10. Plasma samples were assayed for haloperidol, reduced haloperidol, nefazodone, hydroxynefazodone and m-chlorophenylpiperazine by specific, validated high-performance liquid chromatogoraphy methods. Psychomotor performance tests to evaluate haloperidol pharmacodynamics were also performed on days 1, 2, 9, and 10. Reduced haloperidol in the majority of samples was below the limit of quantitation; therefore, the effect of nefazodone on the pharmacokinetics of reduced haloperidol could not be determined. The administration of 5 mg of haloperidol to subjects dosed with nefazodone to steady state led to a modest pharmacokinetic interaction, as indicated by a 36, 13, and 37% increase in mean area under the curve (AUC0-12), highest concentration, and 12-h concentration values for haloperidol, respectively; only the increase in AUC was statistically significant. In contrast, the steady-state pharmacokinetics of nefazodone, hydroxynefazodone, and m-chlorophenylpiperazine were not affected by the administration of haloperidol. Although there were significant differences observed in some psychomotor performance tests, the effects of nefazodone on the pharmacodynamics of haloperidol could not be consistently demonstrated. The results from this study suggest that nefazodone has only modest pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions with haloperidol. Although no specific recommendations can be made, dosage adjustment may be necessary for haloperidol when coadministered with nefazodone.

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel group study, the encephalatropic effects of multiple doses of linopirine (DUP 996), a novel phenylindolinone derivative enhancing the stimulated release of acetylcholine in cholinergic nerve terminals, but also increasing concentrations of dopamine and serotonin, were investigated in 30 elderly, healthy volunteers. Fifteen subjects were randomly assigned to receive 20 mg DUP 996 b.i.d. and 15 were assigned to receive placebo. The doses were given at 12-h intervals for 10 days with an additional morning dose on day 11. Multi-lead EEG recordings were obtained after an adaptation session on day -1, as well as on days 2, 5 and 10 prior to and in the second hour after the morning dose. Computer-assisted spectral analysis of the EEG and subsequent topographic brain mapping of the drug-induced EEG changes demonstrated significant central effects of DUP 996, characterized by an augmentation of total power, decrease of delta and theta activity, increase in alpha and beta activity and an acceleration of the centroid. These findings are opposite to those seen in dementias and indicative of an improvement in vigilance, and have also been described with other cognition-enhancing drugs. Time-course investigations demonstrated more CNS changes 2 hours after than before morning oral dosing on days 2 and 5. The pharmacodynamic peak was observed in the 2nd hour after dosing on day 2. Topographically, the drug-induced changes over time were most pronounced over fronto-temporal, temporo-occipital, parietal and frontal regions, e.g. over brain areas afflicted most by Alzheimer's disease.