A total of 1,002 urine specimens were evaluated by laser nephelometry. This technique was compared with both colony counts, done with a calibrated loop, and serial dilutions. For urine specimens containing between 104 and 105 bacteria per ml, laser nephelometry detected 75.4% of those detected by colony coùnt and 65.6% of those detected by serial dilution. For specimens where the concentration of bacteria was greater than 105 per ml, laser nephelometry detected 95.8 and 92.4% of those detected by colony count and serial dilution, respectively. The mean detection time for bacteriuria varied from 1.57 h for more thah 105 bacteria per ml to 4.47 h for more than 104 bacteria per ml. To determine the number of bacteria according to the voltage growth curve, the passage time at 3 V was used as an index. The mean passage time at 3 V decreased from 5.18 h for fewer than 104 bacteria per ml to 1.42 h for more than 106 bacteria per ml. The mean passage time at 3 V differed significantly for different concentrations of bacteria. Thus, this index allowed us to predict the number of bacteria in the urine specimens. Laser nephelometry has been used for many years for the immunological determination of proteins; it can now also be considered a tool for rapid screening in bacteriology.
Detection of significant bacteriuria with a laser nephelometer was evaluated in this study and compared with the results obtained by the quantitative loop method. We screened 1002 urine specimens and 220 (21.95%) were found to be positive at greater than or equal to 10(5) colony-forming units (CFU)/mL of urine by the standard method. Of the 220 positive specimens, 210 (95.4%) were detected in 6 h or less and 177 (80.4%) were detected within 3 h. The false-positive rate was 2.3% at 3 h and 19.7% at 6 h. These findings suggest that a 6-h procedure is necessary to detect 95% or more of significant bacteriuria. Laser nephelometer is versatile and can be used for rapid screening of bacteriuria.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.